The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ion mobility–mass spectrometry
Abstract
This review article compares and contrasts various types of ion mobility–mass spectrometers available today and describes their advantages for application to a wide range of analytes. Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), when coupled with mass spectrometry, offers value‐added data not possible from mass spectra alone. Separation of isomers, isobars, and conformers; reduction of chemical noise; and measurement of ion size are possible with the addition of ion mobility cells to mass spectrometers. In addition, structurally similar ions and ions of the same charge state can be separated into families of ions which appear along a unique mass‐mobility correlation line. This review describes the four methods of ion mobility separation currently used with mass spectrometry. They are (1) drift‐time ion mobility spectrometry (DTIMS), (2) aspiration ion mobility spectrometry (AIMS), (3) differential‐mobility spectrometry (DMS) which is also called field‐asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) and (4) traveling‐wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS). DTIMS provides the highest IMS resolving power and is the only IMS method which can directly measure collision cross‐sections. AIMS is a low resolution mobility separation method but can monitor ions in a continuous manner. DMS and FAIMS offer continuous‐ion monitoring capability as well as orthogonal ion mobility separation in which high‐separation selectivity can be achieved. TWIMS is a novel method of IMS with a low resolving power but has good sensitivity and is well intergrated into a commercial mass spectrometer. One hundred and sixty references on ion mobility–mass spectrometry (IMMS) are provided. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meier, F., Brunner, A.-D., Koch, S., Koch, H., Lubeck, M., Krause, M., Goedecke, N., Decker, J., Kosinski, T., Park, M. A., et al. (2018) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.tir118.000900 · Cited by 965
Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Fundamental Concepts, Instrumentation, Applications, and the Road Ahead
Dodds, J. N., & Baker, E. S. (2019) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/s13361-019-02288-2 · Cited by 574
Review on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 1: current instrumentation
Cumeras, R., Figueras, E., Davis, C. E., Baumbach, J. I., & Gràcia, I. (2015) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c4an01100g · Cited by 459
Meier, F., Beck, S., Grassl, N., Lubeck, M., Park, M. A., Raether, O., & Mann, M. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00932 · Cited by 423
Breathomics for the clinician: the use of volatile organic compounds in respiratory diseases
Ibrahim, W., Carr, L., Cordell, R., Wilde, M. J., Salman, D., Monks, P. S., Thomas, P., Brightling, C. E., Siddiqui, S., & Greening, N. J. (2021) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215667 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanu, A. B., Dwivedi, P., Tam, M., Matz, L., & Hill, H. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1076-5174 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9888
- OpenAlex
- W2059903043
- Cited by
- 1,154
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ion mobility–mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jms.1383
- The paper
- Kanu, A. B., Dwivedi, P., Tam, M., Matz, L., & Hill, H. H. (2008). Ion mobility–mass spectrometry. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.