The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MetFusion: integration of compound identification strategies
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS) is an important analytical technique for the detection and identification of small compounds. The main bottleneck in the interpretation of metabolite profiling or screening experiments is the identification of unknown compounds from tandem mass spectra. Spectral libraries for tandem MS, such as MassBank or NIST, contain reference spectra for many compounds, but their limited chemical coverage reduces the chance for a correct and reliable identification of unknown spectra outside the database domain. On the other hand, compound databases like PubChem or ChemSpider have a much larger coverage of the chemical space, but they cannot be queried with spectral information directly. Recently, computational mass spectrometry methods and in silico fragmentation prediction allow users to search such databases of chemical structures. We present a new strategy called MetFusion to combine identification results from several resources, in particular, from the in silico fragmenter MetFrag with the spectral library MassBank to improve compound identification. We evaluate the performance on a set of 1062 spectra and achieve an improved ranking of the correct compound from rank 28 using MetFrag alone, to rank 7 with MetFusion, even if the correct compound and similar compounds are absent from the spectral library. On the basis of the evaluation, we extrapolate the performance of MetFusion to the KEGG compound database. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sumner, L. W., Amberg, A., Barrett, D., Beale, M. H., Beger, R., Daykin, C. A., Fan, T. W.-M., Fiehn, O., Goodacre, R., Griffin, J. L., et al. (2007) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2 · Cited by 5,368
Krauss, M., Singer, H., & Hollender, J. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3608-9 · Cited by 743 · cited 1×
“Soft ionization mass spectrometry, often coupled to liquid chromatography (LC-ESI-MS), has been established as an important analytical technology in several applications, such asmetabolomics or screening of unknowns in the environmental sciences.([1,2]) In untargeted approaches, complex samples are analyzed by LC-ESI-…”
BackgroundIn silico fragmentation for computer assisted identification of metabolite mass spectra
Wolf, S., Schmidt, S., Müller-Hannemann, M., & Neumann, S. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-148 · Cited by 698
Self-citationEnvironmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues
Richardson, S. D. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac202903d · Cited by 323
Rojas-Cherto, M., Peironcely, J. E., Kasper, P. T., van der Hooft, J. J. J., de Vos, R. C. H., Vreeken, R., Hankemeier, T., & Reijmers, T. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac2034216 · Cited by 92
Cited by
Metabolomics: beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms
Johnson, C. H., Ivanisevic, J., & Siuzdak, G. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.25 · Cited by 2,829
Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment
Nothias, L.-F., Petras, D., Schmid, R., Dührkop, K., Rainer, J., Sarvepalli, A., Protsyuk, I., Ernst, M., Tsugawa, H., Fleischauer, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0933-6 · Cited by 1,634
Self-citationSearching molecular structure databases with tandem mass spectra using CSI:FingerID
Dührkop, K., Shen, H., Meusel, M., Rousu, J., & Böcker, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509788112 · Cited by 1,190
MetFrag relaunched: incorporating strategies beyond in silico fragmentation
Ruttkies, C., Schymanski, E. L., Wolf, S., Hollender, J., & Neumann, S. (2016) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0115-9 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationThe food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure
Scalbert, A., Brennan, L., Manach, C., Andres-Lacueva, C., Dragsted, L. O., Draper, J., Rappaport, S. M., van der Hooft, J. J., & Wishart, D. S. (2014) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.076133 · Cited by 519
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerlich, M., & Neumann, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-27
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-298
- ISSN
- 1076-5174 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9888
- OpenAlex
- W1598925596
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MetFusion: integration of compound identification strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jms.3123
- The paper
- Gerlich, M., & Neumann, S. (2013). MetFusion: integration of compound identification strategies. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.3123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.