Cited by 7Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Top‐down analysis of novel synthetic branched proteins

Open access
Gomes, Fabio, Lemma, Betsegaw, Abeykoon, Dulith, Chen, Dapeng, Wang, Yan, Fushman, David, Fenselau, Catherine·2019·Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

A strategy for top‐down analysis of branched proteins has been reported earlier, which relies on electron transfer dissociation assisted by collisional activation, and software designed for graphic interpretation of tandem mass spectra and adapted for branched proteins. In the present study, the strategy is applied to identify unknown and novel products of reactions in which rationally mutated proteoforms of Rub1 are used to probe the selectivity of E1 and E2 enzymes normally active in ubiquitination. To test and demonstrate this application, components and attachment sites of three branched dimers are deduced and the mutations are confirmed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jms.4303

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomes, F., Lemma, B., Abeykoon, D., Chen, D., Wang, Y., Fushman, D., & Fenselau, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fushman, David
  • Fenselau, Catherine
Venue
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-13
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
19-25
ISSN
  • 1076-5174 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9888
OpenAlex
W2897196406
Cited by
7
References
19
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Mass Spectrometry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (MCB1818280)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (GM021248, OD019938)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
top-down mass spectrometry, electron transfer dissociation, collisional activation, proteoforms, ubiquitination
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Electron Transport, Ubiquitin, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review