The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ion activation methods for tandem mass spectrometry
Abstract
This tutorial presents the most common ion activation techniques employed in tandem mass spectrometry. In‐source fragmentation and metastable ion decompositions, as well as the general theory of unimolecular dissociations of ions, are initially discussed. This is followed by tandem mass spectrometry, which implies that the activation of ions is distinct from the ionization step, and that the precursor and product ions are both characterized independently by their mass/charge ratios. In collision‐induced dissociation (CID), activation of the selected ions occurs by collision(s) with neutral gas molecules in a collision cell. This experiment can be done at high (keV) collision energies, using tandem sector and time‐of‐flight instruments, or at low (eV range) energies, in tandem quadrupole and ion trapping instruments. It can be performed using either single or multiple collisions with a selected gas and each of these factors influences the distribution of internal energy that the activated ion will possess. While CID remains the most common ion activation technique employed in analytical laboratories today, several new methods have become increasingly useful for specific applications. More recent techniques are examined and their differences, advantages and disadvantages are described in comparison with CID. Collisional activation upon impact of precursor ions on solid surfaces, surface‐induced dissociation (SID), is gaining importance as an alternative to gas targets and has been implemented in several different types of mass spectrometers. Furthermore, unique fragmentation mechanisms of multiply‐charged species can be studied by electron‐capture dissociation (ECD). The ECD technique has been recognized as an efficient means to study non‐covalent interactions and to gain sequence information in proteomics applications. Trapping instruments, such as quadrupole ion traps and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance instruments, are particularly useful for the photoactivation of ions, specifically for fragmentation of precursor ions by infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD). IRMPD is a non‐selective activation method and usually yields rich fragmentation spectra. Lastly, blackbody infrared radiative dissociation is presented with a focus on determining activation energies and other important parameters for the characterization of fragmentation pathways. The individual methods are presented so as to facilitate the understanding of each mechanism of activation and their particular advantages and representative applications. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Networking as a Dereplication Strategy
Yang, J. Y., Sanchez, L. M., Rath, C. M., Liu, X., Boudreau, P. D., Bruns, N., Glukhov, E., Wodtke, A., de Felicio, R., Fenner, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np400413s · Cited by 607
High-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry
Tamara, S., den Boer, M. A., & Heck, A. J. R. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00212 · Cited by 511
Top Down proteomics: Facts and perspectives
Catherman, A. D., Skinner, O. S., & Kelleher, N. L. (2014) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.041 · Cited by 507
“In ECD bond-cleavage occurs before energy can be redistributed throughout the molecule, often attributed to the process being “non-ergodic” and can be utilized to achieve significantly different fragmentation patterns than collisional methods [86,87].”
BackgroundGundry, R. L., White, M. Y., Murray, C. I., Kane, L. A., Fu, Q., Stanley, B. A., & Van Eyk, J. E. (2010) · Current Protocols in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb1025s88 · Cited by 306
From QCEIMS to QCxMS: A Tool to Routinely Calculate CID Mass Spectra Using Molecular Dynamics
Koopman, J., & Grimme, S. (2021) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1021/jasms.1c00098 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Sleno, L., & Volmer, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1091-1112
- ISSN
- 1076-5174 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9888
- OpenAlex
- W2074877005
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ion activation methods for tandem mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jms.703
- The paper
- Sleno, L., & Volmer, D. A. (2004). Ion activation methods for tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.