The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peptidomic analysis of the larval Drosophila melanogaster central nervous system by two‐dimensional capillary liquid chromatography quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Peptides are the largest class of signalling molecules found in animals. Nevertheless, in most proteomic studies peptides are overlooked since they literally fall through the mazes of the net. In analogy with proteomics technology, where all proteins expressed in a cell or tissue are analyzed, the peptidomic approach aims at the simultaneous visualization and identification of the whole peptidome of a cell or tissue, i.e. all expressed peptides with their post‐translational modifications. In this paper we describe the analysis of the larval fruit fly central nervous system using two‐dimensional capillary liquid chromatography/quadrupole time‐of‐flight tandem mass spectrometry (LC/Q‐TOF‐MS/MS. Using the central nervous systems of only 50 larval Drosophila as starting material, we identified 38 peptides in a single analysis, 20 of which were not detected in a previous study that reported on the one‐dimensional capillary LC/MS/MS analysis of the same tissue. Among the 38 sequenced peptides, some originate from precursors, such as the tachykinin and the IFamide precursor that were entirely missed in the first study. This clearly demonstrates that the two‐dimensional capillary LC approach enhances the coverage of the peptidomic analysis. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Cited by
Recent advances in neuropeptide signaling in Drosophila, from genes to physiology and behavior
Nässel, D. R., & Zandawala, M. (2019) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.003 · Cited by 355
Multiple neuropeptides in the Drosophila antennal lobe suggest complex modulatory circuits
Carlsson, M. A., Diesner, M., Schachtner, J., & Nässel, D. R. (2010) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.22405 · Cited by 146
Nässel, D. R. (2009) · Invertebrate Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10158-009-0090-1 · Cited by 125
Johard, H. A. D., Enell, L. E., Gustafsson, E., Trifilieff, P., Veenstra, J. A., & Nässel, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.21636 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Baggerman, G., Boonen, K., Verleyen, P., De Loof, A., & Schoofs, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-260
- ISSN
- 1076-5174 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9888
- OpenAlex
- W2052438257
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.