The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The value of clinical parameters in predicting the severity of COVID‐19
Open accessAbstract
To study the relationship between clinical indexes and the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), and to explore its role in predicting the severity of COVID‐19. Clinical data of 443 patients with COVID‐19 admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, which were divided into nonsevere group (n = 304) and severe group (n = 139) according to their condition. Clinical indicators were compared between different groups. The differences in sex, age, the proportion of patients with combined heart disease, leukocyte, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, D‐dimer, C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, lactate dehydrogenase, and albumin on admission between the two groups were statistically significant (P < .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed NLR and CRP were independent risk factors for severe COVID‐19. Platelets were independent protective factors for severe COVID‐19. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated area under the curve of NLR, platelet, CRP, and combination was 0.737, 0.634, 0.734, and 0.774, respectively. NLR, CRP, and platelets can effectively assess the severity of COVID‐19, among which NLR is the best predictor of severe COVID‐19, and the combination of three clinical indicators can further predict severe COVID‐19.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019
Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001017 · Cited by 28,244
Chen, N., Zhou, M., Dong, X., Qu, J., Gong, F., Han, Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Wei, Y., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30211-7 · Cited by 21,415
A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China
Wu, F., Zhao, S., Yu, B., Chen, Y.-M., Wang, W., Song, Z.-G., Hu, Y., Tao, Z.-W., Tian, J.-H., Pei, Y.-Y., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3 · Cited by 11,688
Cited by
Predictors of COVID‐19 severity: A literature review
Gallo Marin, B., Aghagoli, G., Lavine, K., Yang, L., Siff, E. J., Chiang, S. S., Salazar‐Mather, T. P., Dumenco, L., Savaria, M. C., Aung, S. N., et al. (2021) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.2146 · Cited by 819
Torrente-Rodríguez, R. M., Lukas, H., Tu, J., Min, J., Yang, Y., Xu, C., Rossiter, H. B., & Gao, W. (2020) · Matter · doi:10.1016/j.matt.2020.09.027 · Cited by 490
D-dimer level in COVID-19 infection: a systematic review
Rostami, M., & Mansouritorghabeh, H. (2020) · Expert Review of Hematology · doi:10.1080/17474086.2020.1831383 · Cited by 382
Li, X., Liu, C., Mao, Z., Xiao, M., Wang, L., Qi, S., & Zhou, F. (2020) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03374-8 · Cited by 380
Elevated level of C‐reactive protein may be an early marker to predict risk for severity of COVID‐19
Ali, N. (2020) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.26097 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Shang, W., Dong, J., Ren, Y., Tian, M., Li, W., Hu, J., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Virology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-02
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2188-2192
- ISSN
- 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9071
- OpenAlex
- W3026407766
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The value of clinical parameters in predicting the severity of COVID‐19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmv.26031
- The paper
- Shang, W., Dong, J., Ren, Y., Tian, M., Li, W., Hu, J., & Li, Y. (2020). The value of clinical parameters in predicting the severity of COVID‐19. Journal of Medical Virology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
