Cited by 101Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and EffectsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Ro5-4864, a peripheral benzodiazepine receptor ligand, reduces reactive gliosis and protects hippocampal hilar neurons from kainic acid excitotoxicity

Veiga, Sergio, Azcoitia, I�igo, Garcia-Segura, Luis M.·2005·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

The peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor (PBR) is a critical component of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, which is involved in the regulation of cell survival. Different forms of brain injury result in induction of the expression of the PBR in the areas of neurodegeneration, mainly in reactive glial cells. The consequences of induction of PBR expression after brain injury are unknown. To test whether PBR may be involved in the regulation of neuronal survival after injury, we have assessed the effect of two PBR ligands, Ro5-4864 and PK11195, on neuronal loss induced by kainic acid in the hippocampus. Systemic administration of kainic acid to male rats resulted in the induction of a reactive phenotype in astrocytes and microglia and in a significant loss of hilar neurons in the dentate gyrus. Administration of Ro5-4864, before the injection of kainic acid, decreased reactive gliosis in the hilus and prevented hilar neuronal loss. In contrast, PK11195 was unable to reduce reactive gliosis and did not protect hilar neurons from kainic acid. These findings suggest that the PBR is involved in control of neuronal survival and gliosis after brain injury and identify this molecule as a potential target for neuroprotective interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.20430

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veiga, S., Azcoitia, I., & Garcia-Segura, L. M.
Affiliations
Instituto Cajal (ES)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
129-137
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2037862528
Cited by
101
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Ro5-4864, PK11195, translocator protein (TSPO), reactive gliosis, dentate gyrus, astrocytes, microglia, neuroprotection, mitochondrial permeability transition pore, neuronal survival, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzodiazepinones, Gliosis, Hippocampus, Immunohistochemistry, Isoquinolines, Kainic Acid, Male, Neurons, Vimentin, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, GABA, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Neuroprotective Agents, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review