Cited by 107Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

S/P and T/P phosphorylation is critical for tau neurotoxicity in Drosophila

Steinhilb, Michelle L., Dias‐Santagata, Dora, Mulkearns, Erin E., Shulman, Joshua M., Biernat, Jacek, Mandelkow, Eva‐Maria, Feany, Mel B.·2007·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

The microtubule‐associated protein tau is hyperphosphorylated abnormally in AD and related neurodegenerative disorders. Many phospho epitopes created by proline directed kinases (SP/TP sites) show relative specificity for disease states. To test whether phosphorylation at the disease‐associated SP/TP sites affects tau toxicity in vivo, we expressed a form of tau in Drosophila in which all SP/TP sites are mutated to alanine. We find that blocking phosphorylation at SP/TP motifs markedly reduces tau toxicity in vivo. Using phosphorylation‐specific antibodies, we identify a positive correlation between increased phosphorylation at disease‐associated sites and neurotoxicity. We use the phosphorylation‐incompetent version of tau to show that kinase and phosphatase modifiers of tau neurotoxicity, including cdk5/p35, the JNK kinase hemipterous and PP2A act via SP/TP phosphorylation sites. We provide direct evidence in an animal model system to support the role of phosphorylation at SP/TP sites in playing a critical role in tau neurotoxicity. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.21232

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinhilb, M. L., Dias‐Santagata, D., Mulkearns, E. E., Shulman, J. M., Biernat, J., Mandelkow, E., & Feany, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-04
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
1271-1278
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2144533748
Cited by
107
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • McKnight Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-19790, P50AG005134, AG 05134, R01AG019790)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
tau protein, tau hyperphosphorylation, Alzheimer's disease, Drosophila, Cdk5/p35, JNK kinase, protein phosphatase 2A, proline-directed kinases
MeSH terms
Alanine, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Drosophila, Enzyme Activation, Eye, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Mutation, Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinases, tau Proteins, Neurotoxicity Syndromes, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Proline-Directed Protein Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review