Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Necroptosis, a novel form of caspase‐independent cell death, contributes to neuronal damage in a retinal ischemia‐reperfusion injury model

Open access
Rosenbaum, Daniel M., Degterev, Alexei, David, Joel, Rosenbaum, Pearl S., Roth, Steven, Grotta, James C., Cuny, Gregory D., Yuan, Junying, Savitz, Sean I.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

Necroptosis is programmed necrosis triggered by death receptor signaling. We investigated whether necroptosis contributes to neuronal damage and functional impairment in a model of retinal ischemia. Methods: Sprague‐Dawley rats were subjected to raised intra‐ocular pressure for 45 min and received intravitreal injections of the specific necroptosis inhibitor, Nec‐1, its inactive analogue (Nec‐1i) or vehicle. Seven days after ischemia, ERGs were performed and then the eyes were enucleated for histological analysis. In other animals, retinas were subjected to propodium iodide, TUNEL staining or Western Blotting and probed with anti‐LC‐3 antibody. Results: Retinal ischemia resulted in selective neuronal degeneration of the inner layers. Pretreatment with Nec‐1 led to significant preservation in thickness and histoarchitecture of the inner retina and functional improvement compared with vehicle‐treated controls. Pretreatment with Nec‐1i did not provide histological or functional protection. Post‐treatment with Nec‐1 also significantly attenuated the ERG b‐wave reduction compared with ischemic vehicle controls. Nec‐1 had no effect on the number of caspase or TUNEL‐labelled cells in the ischemic retina but did inhibit the induction of LC‐3 II and reduced the number of PI‐labelled cells after ischemia. Conclusion: Necroptosis is an important mode of neuronal cell death and involves autophagy in a model of retinal ischemia. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.22314

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Rosenbaum, D. M., Degterev, A., David, J., Rosenbaum, P. S., Roth, S., Grotta, J. C., Cuny, G. D., Yuan, J., & Savitz, S. I.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-18
Volume
88
Issue
7
Pages
1569-1576
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2080023466
Cited by
251
References
2
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Necroptosis, a novel form of caspase‐independent cell death, contributes to neuronal damage in a retinal ischemia‐reperfusion injury model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jnr.22314
The paper
Rosenbaum, D. M., Degterev, A., David, J., Rosenbaum, P. S., Roth, S., Grotta, J. C., Cuny, G. D., Yuan, J., & Savitz, S. I. (2010). Necroptosis, a novel form of caspase‐independent cell death, contributes to neuronal damage in a retinal ischemia‐reperfusion injury model. Journal of Neuroscience Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22314

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.