Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multiple and novel specificities of monoclonal antibodies O1, O4, and R‐mAb used in the analysis of oligodendrocyte development

Bansal, R., Warrington, A. E., Gard, A. L., Ranscht, B., Pfeiffer, S. E.·1989·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

Three monoclonal antibodies that react with antigens on the surface of developing oligodendrocytes in a stage‐specific manner, 01, 04 (Sommer and Schachner, 1981), and R‐mAb (Ranscht et al., 1982), have been studied with respect to their specificities for a number of purified lipids. The observed specificities were consistent regardless of how the antigens were presented to the antibodies. 01 reacted with galactocerebroside, monogalactosyl‐diglyceride, and psychosine and, in addition, labeled an unidentified species in rat brain extracts. R‐mAb reacted with galactocerebroside, monogalactosyl‐diglyceride, sulfatide, seminolipid, and psychosine; the reaction of R‐mAb with sulfatide was nearly equal to that with galactocerebroside. 04 reacted with sulfatide, seminolipid, and to some extent with cholesterol. However, oligodendrocyte progenitor cells labeling with 04 that had not yet begun to express the 01 antigen failed to incorporate 35 SO 4 or [3 H]galactose into sulfatide or seminolipid, the syntheses of which first appear in 01‐positive cells. Therefore, 04 stains, in addition to sulfatide and seminolipid, an unidentified antigen that appears on the surface of oligodendrocyte progenitors prior to the expression of sulfatide and galactocerebroside. In primary cultures of rat brain, developing 04+ oligodendrocyte progenitors stained slightly earlier with R‐mAb than with 01, and thus R‐mAb transiently stained a larger population of oligodendrocytes than did 01. None of the three antibodies produced a detectable reaction on Western immunoblot after separation of brain proteins on reducing gels. In conclusion, the results show that 04, R‐mAb, and 01 have multiple overlapping specificities, including previously unrecognized cross‐reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.490240413

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 419

Metadata

Authors
Bansal, R., Warrington, A. E., Gard, A. L., Ranscht, B., & Pfeiffer, S. E.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
548-557
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2041165891
Cited by
419
References
0
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple and novel specificities of monoclonal antibodies O1, O4, and R‐mAb used in the analysis of oligodendrocyte development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jnr.490240413
The paper
Bansal, R., Warrington, A. E., Gard, A. L., Ranscht, B., & Pfeiffer, S. E. (1989). Multiple and novel specificities of monoclonal antibodies O1, O4, and R‐mAb used in the analysis of oligodendrocyte development. Journal of Neuroscience Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.490240413

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.