The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises
Abstract
The psychological contract has been viewed as an explanatory framework for understanding the employment relationship, and is regarded by some researchers as central in understanding employee attitudes and behavior. Despite the importance ascribed to the psychological contract, it remains theoretically underdeveloped and has received limited empirical attention. This study takes a new approach to researching the psychological contract, through the use of daily diaries, and addresses a number of fundamental questions regarding its nature. Results show that both broken and exceeded promises occur regularly and in relation to virtually any aspect of work, that the importance of the promise contributes significantly to emotional reactions following broken and exceeded promises, and that the psychological contract is an important concept for understanding everyday fluctuations in emotion and daily mood. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements
Rousseau, D. (1995) · doi:10.4135/9781452231594 · Cited by 3,453
The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health.
Warr, P. (1990) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00521.x · Cited by 1,490
Cited by
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
A review of the time management literature
Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480710726136 · Cited by 792
Beal, D. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111335 · Cited by 436
Suazo, M. M. (2009) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940910928856 · Cited by 210
Daily fluctuations in teachers' well-being: A diary study using the job demands–resources model
Simbula, S. (2010) · Anxiety, Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615801003728273 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Conway, N., & Briner, R. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-302
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2121064125
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.139
- The paper
- Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
