CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 201Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingStress and Burnout Research

Daily fluctuations in teachers' well-being: A diary study using the job demands–resources model

Simbula, Silvia·2010·Anxiety, Stress & Coping
DOI 10.1080/10615801003728273
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The study tests the dynamic nature of the Job Demands-Resources model with regard to both motivational and health impairment processes. It does so by examining whether daily fluctuations in co-workers' support (i.e., a typical job resource) and daily fluctuations in work/family conflict (i.e., a typical job demand) predict day-levels of job satisfaction and mental health through work engagement and exhaustion, respectively. A total of 61 schoolteachers completed a general questionnaire and a daily survey over a period of five consecutive work days. Multilevel analyses provided evidence for both the above processes. Consistently with the hypotheses, our results showed that day-level work engagement mediated the impact of day-level co-workers' support on day-level job satisfaction and day-level mental health, after general levels of work engagement and outcome variables had been controlled for. Moreover, day-level exhaustion mediated the relationship between day-level work/family conflict and day-level job satisfaction and day-level mental health after general levels of exhaustion and outcome variables had been controlled for. These findings provide new insights into the dynamic psychological processes that determine daily fluctuations in employee well-being. Such insights may be transformed into job redesign strategies and other interventions designed to enhance work-related psychological well-being on a daily level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615801003728273

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The great majority of studies measured TWB as a trait, while only four assessed it as a dynamic state using daily measures.

    “It also worth noting that the great majority of studies measured TWB as a trait, while only four assessed it as a dynamic state using daily measures (Aldrup et al., 2018;Lavy & Eshet, 2018;Simbula, 2010;Tadić Vujčić, Oerlemans, & Bakker, 2017).”

    From Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as Simbula, 2010

  • Daily fluctuations in subjective work engagement and exhaustion played a role in the relationship between colleague support or conflict and teacher well-being.

    “daily fluctuations in subjective work engagement and exhaustion played a role concerning the relationship between colleague support or conflict and TWB (Simbula, 2010).”

    From Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as Simbula, 2010

  • The four studies that applied daily diaries covered a minimum of five to a maximum of 10 working days.

    “the four studies that applied daily diaries (Aldrup et al., 2017;Lavy & Eshet, 2018;Simbula, 2010;Tadić Vujčić et al., 2017) covered a minimum of five to a maximum of 10 working days.”

    From Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as Simbula, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Simbula, S.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Simbula, Silvia
ORCID
Simbula, Silvia
Venue
Anxiety, Stress & Coping
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2010-10
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
563-584
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
DOI
10.1080/10615801003728273
OpenAlex
W1980396227
Cited by
201
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
job demands-resources model, daily fluctuations, teacher well-being, work-family conflict, job satisfaction, mental health, work engagement, exhaustion, mediation, school teachers, diary study
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Conflict, Psychological, Faculty, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Italy, Job Satisfaction, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Workload, Family Conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review