The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: a meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
A meta‐analysis was conducted to estimate the true correlation between attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance and to identify moderators of this correlation. One‐hundred and eleven samples from 93 published studies were included. The corrected mean correlation was 0.20. The correlation was at least marginally significantly stronger for: (a) extra‐role performance as opposed to in‐role performance; (b) white‐collar workers as opposed to blue‐collar workers; and (c) performance assessed by self ratings as opposed to supervisor ratings or objective indicators. Four other assumed moderators (commitment measure: Affective Commitment Scale versus Organizational Commitment Questionnaire, job level, age, and tenure) did not have at least marginally significant effects. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Cohen, A. (1991) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1991.tb00558.x · Cited by 287
Cited by
CHRISTIAN, M. S., GARZA, A. S., & SLAUGHTER, J. E. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x · Cited by 2,903
Organizational identification: A meta-analysis
Riketta, M. (2005) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005 · Cited by 1,808
Self-citationHarrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786077 · Cited by 1,245
Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020858 · Cited by 652
The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies.
Riketta, M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472 · Cited by 547
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Riketta, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-266
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W1990954480
- Cited by
- 1,148
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.141
- The paper
- Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
