The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does job insecurity lead to impaired well‐being or vice versa? Estimation of cross‐lagged effects using latent variable modelling
Abstract
Although research suggests that job insecurity is associated with impaired employee well‐being, there is insufficient empirical evidence to draw any causal inferences since most studies are cross‐sectional and thus do not control for previous levels of health symptoms. We used longitudinal questionnaire data to investigate the direction of the relationship between job insecurity and health complaints. After controlling for prior levels of mental and physical health complaints and five other variables that could potentially confound the results (gender, age, organizational tenure, family status, and education), the results of latent variable modelling showed that the cross‐lagged effect of job insecurity on mental health complaints, one year later, was significant whereas the reversed effects of mental and physical health complaints on subsequent insecurity were non‐significant. However, there was no significant cross‐lagged effect of job insecurity on physical health complaints. The results provide empirical support for the theoretical notion that job insecurity leads to health complaints, and imply that prior levels of health should be taken into consideration in order to explain the relative effect of perceived job insecurity on the physical and mental health of the workforce. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Akaike, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294359 · Cited by 5,264
Akaike, H. (1987) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29 · Cited by 4,027
Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.145 · Cited by 1,174
Whither Industrial and Organizational Psychology in a Changing World of Work?
Cascio, W. F. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.11.928 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Technology usage, expected job sustainability, and perceived job insecurity
Nam, T. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.017 · Cited by 282
Vander Elst, T., Van den Broeck, A., De Witte, H., & De Cuyper, N. (2012) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2012.703900 · Cited by 210
Tang, K. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.3431 · Cited by 70
Fløvik, L., Knardahl, S., & Christensen, J. O. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02845 · Cited by 50
Zhu, H., Zhao, F., Liu, J., Chen, Y., & Wang, L. (2026) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.70051 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Hellgren, J., & Sverke, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-236
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2070740484
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.