An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability
Abstract
Summary: Accountability is a fundamental element of all societies and the organizations that operate within them. This paper focuses on the individual‐level accountability concept of felt accountability (also referred to in the literature as simply accountability ), which can be described as the perceptions of one's personal accountability. We describe key theories that have formed the theoretical groundwork for the body of felt accountability literature, and discuss the empirical research published since the last major review of the accountability literature in the late 1990s. Empirical research has revealed that accountability has both constructive and deleterious consequences. Moreover, research examining accountability and key outcomes has produced mixed results, suggesting that consideration of moderators and nonlinear relationships are important when examining accountability. Although accountability is an important construct, there are many issues that have yet to be investigated by scholars. We identify limitations and gaps in the current body of the empirical research and conclude the paper with suggestions for scholars striving to make contributions to this line of research. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If oversight persons feel accountable, this may influence their attentiveness or lead to feeling more stressed.
“If oversight persons feel accountable for their actions this may influence their attentiveness or may lead to them feeling more stressed [35].”
From On the Quest for Effectiveness in Human Oversight: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 106 · Cited by 335
- Authors
- Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Buckley, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- University of Mississippi (US)
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Angela T.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-224
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2139233234
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 22.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
- Keywords
- felt accountability, individual accountability, accountability theory, nonlinear relationship, research gaps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review