Cited by 335Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEthics in Business and EducationAccounting and Organizational Management

An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability

Hall, Angela T., Frink, Dwight D., Buckley, M. Ronald·2017·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Summary: Accountability is a fundamental element of all societies and the organizations that operate within them. This paper focuses on the individual‐level accountability concept of felt accountability (also referred to in the literature as simply accountability ), which can be described as the perceptions of one's personal accountability. We describe key theories that have formed the theoretical groundwork for the body of felt accountability literature, and discuss the empirical research published since the last major review of the accountability literature in the late 1990s. Empirical research has revealed that accountability has both constructive and deleterious consequences. Moreover, research examining accountability and key outcomes has produced mixed results, suggesting that consideration of moderators and nonlinear relationships are important when examining accountability. Although accountability is an important construct, there are many issues that have yet to be investigated by scholars. We identify limitations and gaps in the current body of the empirical research and conclude the paper with suggestions for scholars striving to make contributions to this line of research. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.2052

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If oversight persons feel accountable, this may influence their attentiveness or lead to feeling more stressed.

    “If oversight persons feel accountable for their actions this may influence their attentiveness or may lead to them feeling more stressed [35].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 106 · Cited by 335

Authors
Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Buckley, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Angela T.
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
204-224
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W2139233234
Cited by
335
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4
FWCI
22.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
Keywords
felt accountability, individual accountability, accountability theory, nonlinear relationship, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review