The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons
Open accessAbstract
We tested the impact of teammates' team and task mental model sharedness on team processes and performance using 70 undergraduate teams that completed a series of missions on a PC-based flight simulator. Moreover, we considered how the quality of mental models might moderate such relationships. Team processes were found to partially mediate the relationship between task mental model sharedness and team performance. Although team mental model sharedness failed to exhibit a significant linear relationship with team processes or performance, it did evidence a multiplicative relationship as moderated by the quality of those models. Team processes and performance were better among teams sharing higher-quality team mental models than among teams evidencing less sharedness or who had lower-quality models. Again, team processes partially mediated these relationships. Results are discussed in terms of the equifinality of mental model quality and applications to various team environments. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 10,806
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000) · Cited by 4,914
Klecka, W. (1980) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412983938 · Cited by 3,723
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Self-citationChan, D. K. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.83.2.234 · Cited by 2,972
The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Eduardo Salas, A., & Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.2.273 · Cited by 2,579
Self-citation(2000) · Cited by 2,531
Aldenderfer, M. S. (1984) · Cited by 2,502
Aldenderfer, M., & Blashfield, R. (1984) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412983648 · Cited by 2,137
Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639402000206 · Cited by 1,632
Cited by
van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546 · Cited by 2,200
The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis.
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017328 · Cited by 1,014
LePINE, J. A., PICCOLO, R. F., JACKSON, C. L., MATHIEU, J. E., & SAUL, J. R. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x · Cited by 940
Self-citationMetaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct
Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309356804 · Cited by 832
Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims, H. P. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0132 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-56
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2158344162
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.296
- The paper
- Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
