The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing the career deal: the psychological contract as a framework for understanding career management, organizational commitment and work behavior
Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a study that investigated the relationship between different kinds of career management activities, the psychological contract, and outcomes of psychological contract fulfillment. The study tested a series of linked hypotheses which propose that individual career management behavior is associated with the experience of organizational career management help, which is related to fulfillment of the psychological contract. Fulfillment of the psychological contract in turn is linked to organizational commitment and is associated with behaviors at work, including absenteeism, turnover, and independent ratings of job performance. The findings provide some support for these proposed links. As a result, the paper makes four contributions to the psychological contract and careers literature: first, it shows that both individual and organizational career management behaviors are linked to psychological contract fulfillment; second, organizational career management help is associated with affective commitment and job performance; third, psychological contract fulfillment plays a key role in mediating the relationship between career management help and such attitudes and behaviors; and fourth, organizational commitment may mediate between psychological contract fulfillment and individual career management behavior aimed at furthering the career outside the organization. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Exchange and Power in Social Life
Blau, P. M. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9780203792643 · Cited by 15,923
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,624
Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 · Cited by 7,592
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 · Cited by 6,458
Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application
Meyer, J., & Allen, N. (1997) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231556 · Cited by 3,990
Commitment in the workplace: theory, research, and application
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-0996 · Cited by 3,368
Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. M., & LaMastro, V. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.75.1.51 · Cited by 3,059
Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract
Robinson, S. L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393868 · Cited by 2,991
Cited by
Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment.
Solinger, O. N., van Olffen, W., & Roe, R. A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.70 · Cited by 707
The psychological contract: A critical review
Cullinane, N., & Dundon, T. (2006) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00123.x · Cited by 393
Nauta, A., van Vianen, A., van der Heijden, B., van Dam, K., & Willemsen, M. (2009) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317908x320147 · Cited by 309
Reassessing the protean career concept: Empirical findings, conceptual components, and measurement
Gubler, M., Arnold, J., & Coombs, C. (2014) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1908 · Cited by 279
Lemmon, G., Wilson, M. S., Posig, M., & Glibkowski, B. C. (2016) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051816645745 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Sturges, J., Conway, N., Guest, D., & Liefooghe, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 821-838
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2087507914
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 25.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing the career deal: the psychological contract as a framework for understanding career management, organizational commitment and work behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.341
- The paper
- Sturges, J., Conway, N., Guest, D., & Liefooghe, A. (2005). Managing the career deal: the psychological contract as a framework for understanding career management, organizational commitment and work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.