The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coping with job stress: A conceptual evaluation framework for coping measures
Abstract
Intense interest in stress had led to a proliferation of coping measures. To aid researchers in choosing or developing coping measures applicable to job stress, this paper provides a conceptual evaluation framework. The framework serves to evaluate the extent to which coping measures are comprehensive (focus and method of coping) and specific (coping behaviors versus coping effectiveness, coping style, or coping resources; and stress management applications). Both theoretical and organizational stress management perspectives are incorporated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136319 · Cited by 7,791 · cited 5×
“A review of coping dimensions in Table 2 repeatedly suggests that control-oriented strategies such as action (Ilfeld, 1980) or optimistic action (Pearlin and Schooler, 1978) are empirically distinct from escape-oriented strategies such as rationalization-resignation (Ilfeld, 1980) and substitution of rewards and selec…”
BackgroundInfluentialPearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136676 · Cited by 6,289
Does coping help? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health
Aldwin, C. M., & Revenson, T. A. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.337 · Cited by 1,076
Stress and adaptational outcomes. The problem of confounded measures
Lazarus, R. S., DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Gruen, R. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.7.770 · Cited by 809
Depression and coping in stressful episodes
Coyne, J. C., Aldwin, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.90.5.439 · Cited by 539
Cited by
Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216 · Cited by 2,639
Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20004 · Cited by 2,565
Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: a meta-analytic study
McKee-Ryan, F., Song, Z., Wanberg, C. R., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.53 · Cited by 2,269
Lazarus and Folkman's Psychological Stress and Coping Theory
Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Drummond, S. (2017) · The Handbook of Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/9781118993811.ch21 · Cited by 780
Chun Chu, A. H., & Choi, J. N. (2005) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.145.3.245-264 · Cited by 765
Metadata
- Authors
- Latack, J. C., & Havlovic, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 479-508
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2019084115
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coping with job stress: A conceptual evaluation framework for coping measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.4030130505
- The paper
- Latack, J. C., & Havlovic, S. J. (1992). Coping with job stress: A conceptual evaluation framework for coping measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
