The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Equity sensitivity and outcome importance
Open accessAbstract
One recent approach that holds promise for building a conceptual framework for a psychological individual difference variable in equity theory is Equity Sensitivity (Huseman, Hatfield and Miles, 1987). Huseman et al. identify three types of individuals — Benevolents, Equity Sensitives, Entitleds. As originally defined, these three groups vary in their desire for outcomes (e.g. pay) in a relationship. The purpose of this study is to test whether the three groups — Benevolents, Equity Sensitives, and Entitleds — vary in the importance they place on categories of outcomes. Hypotheses are tested regarding importance placed on extrinsic tangible, extrinsic intangible, and intrinsic work outcomes. The sample include 2617 employees from the banking and public utility industries. Results show that the three groups vary in the importance they place on extrinsic tangible and intrinsic outcomes, but not on the importance placed on extrinsic intangible outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While under-reward was thought to go along with feelings of frustration, over-reward was thought to go along with feelings of guilt, both being associated with lower satisfaction in the job (Miles et al., 1994;Sweeney, 1990).”
From What satisfies younger versus older employees, and why? An aging perspective on equity theory to explain interactive effects of employee age, monetary rewards, and task contributions on job satisfaction (2020) · cites this paper as Miles et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“At the same time, benevolents have a higher tolerance (albeit not a preference) for under-reward situations (Miles et al., 1994).”
From What satisfies younger versus older employees, and why? An aging perspective on equity theory to explain interactive effects of employee age, monetary rewards, and task contributions on job satisfaction (2020) · cites this paper as Miles et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“For benevolents, over-reward situations create the strongest dissonance and thus dissatisfaction.”
From What satisfies younger versus older employees, and why? An aging perspective on equity theory to explain interactive effects of employee age, monetary rewards, and task contributions on job satisfaction (2020) · cites this paper as Miles et al., 1994
Citations
Cites
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Towards an understanding of inequity
Adams, J. S. (1963) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040968 · Cited by 5,146
A Primer of Multivariate Statistics
Strauss, D., & Harris, R. J. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529445 · Cited by 1,980
The Analysis of Contingency Tables
Odoroff, C. L., & Everitt, B. A. (1978) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268142 · Cited by 1,544
(1992) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90232-q · Cited by 1,296
Societal structures of the mind
(1975) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(75)80165-1 · Cited by 1,008
Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S., & Willis, R. H. (1980) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5 · Cited by 987
The Analysis of Contingency Tables
Everitt, B. J. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2927-3 · Cited by 947
A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct
Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4307799 · Cited by 910
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.844 · DOI
- Huseman R. C., 1990, Equity theory and the managerial matrix, Training & Development Journal, 44, 98
- 10.2307/258531 · DOI
- Miles E. W.(1988). ‘Equity sensitivity and the comparisons other grid: A proposed approach to the integration of equity theory and outcome‐maximizing theories of employee motivation’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Georgia Athens Georgia.
- 10.2466/PR0.69.7.853-854 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of personality on psychological contracts
Raja, U., Johns, G., & Ntalianis, F. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159586 · Cited by 822
Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s
Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500302 · Cited by 608
Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees.
Lynch, P. D., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.467 · Cited by 559
Social Justice: History, Theory, and Research
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002030 · Cited by 298
Kickul, J. R., & Lester, S. W. (2001) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1011105132252 · Cited by 265
Organizational justice: The dynamics of fairness in the workplace.
Greenberg, J. (2010) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/12171-008 · Cited by 212
Unearned Status Gain: Evidence from a Global Language Mandate
Neeley, T. B., & Dumas, T. L. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0535 · Cited by 171
O’Neill, B. S., & Mone, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.805 · Cited by 161
Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Kensbock, J. M., & Peschl, A. (2020) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21981 · Cited by 209
Attitudinal and Behavioral Outcomes of Psychological Contract Breach
Kickul, J. R., Lester, S. W., & Belgio, E. (2004) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/1470595804044751 · Cited by 141
Equity Sensitivity: Construction of a Measure and Examination of Its Psychometric Properties
Sauley, K. S., & Bedeian, A. G. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600507 · Cited by 135
Scott, B. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2007) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601106286877 · Cited by 131
Salin, D., & Notelaers, G. (2017) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2017.1330780 · Cited by 126
Does Trust Matter? The Relationship Between Equity Sensitivity and Perceived Organizational Justice
Kickul, J. R., Gundry, L. K., & Posig, M. (2005) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-004-0992-0 · Cited by 112
Emotional Competence as Antecedent to Performance: A Contingency Framework
Abraham, R. (2004) · Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs · doi:10.3200/mono.130.2.117-145 · Cited by 110
Paik, Y., Parboteeah, K. P., & Shim, W.-S. (2007) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190701570940 · Cited by 100
Usmani, S., & Jamal, S. (2013) · Cited by 95
Old faces, new places: equity theory in cross‐cultural contexts
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.454 · Cited by 95
Sustaining Corporate Entrepreneurship
Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Goldsby, M. G. (2004) · The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation · doi:10.5367/000000004773863237 · Cited by 87
Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Introduction and Research Review
Kuratko, D. F. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9_6 · Cited by 86
Joshi, K. (2005) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2005.10856057 · Cited by 78
Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Bordia, S. (2009) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9097-1 · Cited by 77
The predictive and interactive effects of equity sensitivity in teamwork‐oriented organizations
Bing, M. N., & Burroughs, S. M. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.68 · Cited by 72
Equity sensitivity and business ethics
Mudrack, P. E., Mason, E. S., & Stepeanski, K. M. (1999) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317999166833 · Cited by 70
Suazo, M. M., & Turnley, W. H. (2010) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941011056969 · Cited by 69
Procedural and Distributive Justice: Examining Equity in a University Setting
Hartman, S. J., Yrle, A. C., & Gallé, W. P. (1999) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1006102216883 · Cited by 67
Mueller, S. L., & Clarke, L. D. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256910 · Cited by 68
Shih, C., & Chuang, C. (2012) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9294-8 · Cited by 66
CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP BEHAVIOR AMONG MANAGERS: A REVIEW OF THEORY, RESEARCH, AND PRACTICE
Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2004) · Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth · doi:10.1016/s1074-7540(04)07002-3 · Cited by 64
Cultural values in relation to equity sensitivity within and across cultures
Wheeler, K. G. (2002) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940210444067 · Cited by 63
The relationships among individual differences, needs and equity sensitivity
Yamaguchi, I. (2003) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940310473082 · Cited by 57
Leader responsiveness, equity sensitivity, and employee attitudes and behavior
Shore, T. H., Sy, T., & Strauss, J. P. (2006) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-006-9026-5 · Cited by 54
A Psychological Contract Perspective of Expatriate Failure
Perera, H. K., Chew, Y. T., & Nielsen, I. L. (2016) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21788 · Cited by 59
Equity Sensitivity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in a Team Environment
Akan, O. H., Allen, R. S., & White, C. S. (2008) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496408326575 · Cited by 51
Sharing economy platforms: An equity theory perspective on reciprocity and commitment
Davlembayeva, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.039 · Cited by 59
Foote, D. A., & Harmon, S. K. (2006) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940610650721 · Cited by 50
Walker, H. J., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., Bernerth, J. B., & Jones‐Farmer, L. A. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.434 · Cited by 49
Equity Sensitivity: A Triadic Measure and Outcome/input Perspectives
Clark, L. A., Foote, D. A., Clark, R., & Lewis, J. (2010) · Journal of managerial issues · Cited by 43
Exploring managers' intention to use business intelligence: the role of motivations
Chang, Y., Hsu, P., & Wu, Z. (2014) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2014.968208 · Cited by 61
A Role for Equity Theory in the Turnover Process: An Empirical Test1
Griffeth, R. W., & Gaertner, S. (2001) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02660.x · Cited by 43
Allen, R. S., Evans, W. R., & White, C. S. (2011) · Organization Management Journal · doi:10.1057/omj.2011.40 · Cited by 41
Individualism, collectivism, selected personality traits, and psychological contract in employment
Zhao, J., & Chen, L. (2008) · Management Research News · doi:10.1108/01409170810851357 · Cited by 39
Is Fair Treatment Enough? Augmenting the Fairness-Based Perspective on Stakeholder Behaviour
Hayibor, S. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2665-6 · Cited by 38
“I’d only let you down”: Guilt proneness and the avoidance of harmful interdependence.
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Cohen, T. R. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037523 · Cited by 40
Roehling, M. V., Roehling, P. V., & Boswell, W. R. (2009) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/s10672-009-9130-6 · Cited by 37
Effects of Internal and External Pay Comparisons on Work Attitudes1
Shore, T. H., Tashchian, A., & Jourdan, L. (2006) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00204.x · Cited by 37
Revisiting the “give and take” in LMX
Han, Y., Sears, G. J., & Zhang, H. (2018) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-05-2017-0152 · Cited by 35
Burke, L. A., & Moore, J. E. (2000) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(99)00047-9 · Cited by 37
Chhokar, J. S., Zhuplev, A. V., Fok, L. Y., & Hartman, S. J. (2001) · International Journal of Value-Based Management · doi:10.1023/a:1007865414146 · Cited by 33
Assessing roadblocks to justice: A model of fair behavior in organizations
Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. J. (2009) · Research in personnel and human resources management · doi:10.1108/s0742-7301(2009)0000028009 · Cited by 32
Joshi, K., & Lauer, D. T. W. (1998) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00069-x · Cited by 30
Individual differences in equity models
Hofmans, J. (2012) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 27
Joshi, K. D., & Lauer, T. W. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.797963 · Cited by 27
Lauer, T. W., Joshi, K., & Browdy, T. A. (2000) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2000.0070091 · Cited by 26
An Alternative Lens for Understanding Technology Acceptance: An Equity Comparison Perspective
Hess, T. J., Joshi, K., & McNab, A. L. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919391003712447 · Cited by 26
Kim, C. Y., Lee, J. H., & Shin, S.-Y. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030657 · Cited by 26
Superiors' Conflict Management Strategies and Subordinate Outcomes
Weider‐Hatfield, D., & Hatfield, J. D. (1996) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318996010002003 · Cited by 23
Self-citationDoes equity sensitivity moderate the relationship between effort–reward imbalance and burnout
Oren, L., & Littman‐Ovadia, H. (2012) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2012.753060 · Cited by 22
An interactionist perspective on employee performance as a response to psychological contract breach
Lee, J., Chaudhry, A., & Tekleab, A. G. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-10-2012-0173 · Cited by 21
Determinants of psychological contract breach: an empirical study of Vietnamese employees
Huy, P. T., & Takahashi, K. (2017) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-11-2016-0244 · Cited by 21
Overreward and the Impostor Phenomenon
McDowell, W. C., Boyd, N. G., & Bowler, W. M. (2007) · Journal of managerial issues · Cited by 20
Shore, T. H., & Strauss, J. P. (2008) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.102.1.64-78 · Cited by 19
Campbell, J. W., & Im, T. (2019) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/0091026019832632 · Cited by 19
Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., & Dawkins, M. C. (1995) · Journal of managerial issues · Cited by 18
Wheeler, K. G. (2007) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.100.3.955-962 · Cited by 17
Come rain or come shine: supervisor behavior and employee job neglect
Karimi, L., Gilbreath, B., Kim, T., & Grawitch, M. J. (2014) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-05-2012-0066 · Cited by 17
Examining Equity Sensitivity: An Investigation Using the Big Five and HEXACO Models of Personality
Woodley, H. J. R., Bourdage, J. S., Ogunfowora, B., & Nguyen, B. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02000 · Cited by 19
Arya, B., Mirchandani, D. A., & Harris, M. M. (2017) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1282531 · Cited by 17
Do follower characteristics moderate leadership and employee engagement?
Zhang, T., Avery, G. C., Bergsteiner, H., & More, E. A. (2014) · Journal of Global Responsibility · doi:10.1108/jgr-04-2014-0016 · Cited by 15
Zhang, T. (2011) · Figshare · doi:10.25949/19439999 · Cited by 15
Rai, S., Megyeri, E., & Kazár, K. (2020) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-07-2020-2334 · Cited by 14
Gefen, D., & Reychav, I. (2013) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2013.11.002 · Cited by 14
Psychological Influences on Referent Choice
O’Neill, B. S., & Mone, M. A. (2005) · e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) · Cited by 14
Towards an understanding of the volunteer tourism experience
Coghlan, A. (2025) · ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) · doi:10.25903/h6fy-5t43 · Cited by 14
Pengaruh Love of Money, Equity Sensitivity, dan Machiavellian Pada Persepsi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi
Sari, N. L. P. W. A., & Widanaputra, A. A. G. P. (2019) · E-Jurnal Akuntansi · doi:10.24843/eja.2019.v28.i02.p27 · Cited by 13
Yiu, T. W., Keung, C. C. W., & Wong, K. L. (2010) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000031 · Cited by 13
Equity Theory: Evaluating Fairness
Polk, D. M. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394266616.ch9 · Cited by 20
Auditing management practices in schools
Zwijze‐Koning, K. H., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2009) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/09513540910941739 · Cited by 11
Hess, T. J., & Hightower, R. (2002) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 11
Oesch, J. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (2003) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1022926111093 · Cited by 11
Pay satisfaction consequences : development and test of a theoretical model
Faulk, L. H. (2002) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.321 · Cited by 11
Ethical Leadership: Not Everyone Responds Equally
Evans, W. R., Allen, R. S., & Clayton, R. W. (2016) · Organization Management Journal · doi:10.1080/15416518.2016.1253453 · Cited by 10
Delerue, H., & Hamid, M. (2014) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12075 · Cited by 9
Pay satisfaction consequences : development and test of a theoretical model
Faulk, & Hugh, L. (2002) · Cited by 10
Jeon, G., & Newman, D. A. (2016) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.08.005 · Cited by 9
Mueller, S. L., & Clarke, L. D. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256910 · Cited by 9
Revisiting equity theory in the global virtual teams
Tavoletti, E., Cohen, E. D., Dong, L., & Taras, V. (2023) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-05-2023-0334 · Cited by 8
Lee, Y., Berry, C. M., & Rees, R. (2024) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104064 · Cited by 9
Obuobi, B., Li, X., Nketiah, E., Awuah, F., Boateng, E. D., Sampene, A. K., Wiredu, J., Ashun, J., Adu‐Gyamfi, G., & Adjei, M. T. (2020) · international journal of research in computer application & management · doi:10.12691/ijefm-8-1-3 · Cited by 8
Influences of (in)congruences in psychological entitlement and felt obligation on ethical behavior
Chen, Q., Shen, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., Zheng, J., & Xiu, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1052759 · Cited by 8
Ha, T.-S., & Moon, K.-K. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15118602 · Cited by 16
Equity Sensitivity in “Fringe” Benefit Value and Satisfaction
Weathington, B. L., & Reddock, C. M. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management · doi:10.21818/001c.17869 · Cited by 8
Eren, G., & Demir, R. (2023) · Ege Akademik Bakis (Ege Academic Review) · doi:10.21121/eab.1103337 · Cited by 7
Sass, M., Liao‐Troth, M. A., & Wonder, B. D. (2011) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.20049 · Cited by 7
Perceived performance, equity sensitivity and organisational commitment among bank managers
Vella, J. M., Caruana, A., & PITT, L. F. (2012) · Journal of Financial Services Marketing · doi:10.1057/fsm.2012.1 · Cited by 6
The Impact of Incentives on Interfunctional Relationship Quality: Views from a South African Firm
Prinsloo, M., Bäckström, L., & Salehi‐Sangari, E. (2007) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783360701350870 · Cited by 6
Tuli, N., Shrivastava, K., & Khattar, D. (2023) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-10-2021-0739 · Cited by 5
Equity Perceptions as a Determinant of Computer User Satisfaction in Human Services
Monnickendam, M., Savaya, R., & Waysman, M. (2004) · Journal of Social Service Research · doi:10.1300/j079v31n02_03 · Cited by 5
Cohen, A. G. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137524317_4 · Cited by 5
Big Five Personality Traits and Equity Sensitivity and Transformational Leadership
이은희 (2013) · International Journal of Social Science and Humanity · doi:10.7763/ijssh.2012.v2.89 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Miles, E. W., Hatfield, J. D., & Huseman, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hatfield, John D.
- ORCID
- Miles, Edward W.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 585-596
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2037615146
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- equity sensitivity, equity theory, individual differences, wages, bank employees, public utility employees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review