The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological ownership within the job design context: revision of the job characteristics model
Abstract
In this paper, we offer a theoretical modification to the Hackman and Oldham (1975) Job Characteristics Model by integrating research on the psychological aspects of job design with emerging theory on psychological ownership. We develop the connection between job design and (a) the motives facilitating psychological ownership, (b) the routes through which psychological ownership emerges, and (c) the individual‐level outcomes (e.g., emotional, attitudinal, motivational, and behavioral) that result from an employee's psychological ownership of his or her job. Our work covers several previously ignored positive and negative effects. We conclude by positioning psychological ownership as a plausible substitute for other proposed mediating psychological states in the job design–employee response relationship. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040934 · Cited by 5,681
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
Deci, E. L. (1975) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9 · Cited by 2,911
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
Cited by
The Needs–Affordances–Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media1
Karahanna, E., Xu, S. X., Xu, Y., & Zhang, N. (. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/11492 · Cited by 518
Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications for Research in Marketing
Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2015.1002330 · Cited by 361
Self-citationWohlers, C., & Hertel, G. (2017) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1188220 · Cited by 223
Jiang, D., Zhang, G., & Wang, L. (2021) · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.3390/jtaer16060111 · Cited by 40
“This is mainly derived from the need for a sense of belonging of psychological ownership, and individuals can have a sense of belonging to various items [59].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I., & Cummings, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-496
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2023956388
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological ownership within the job design context: revision of the job characteristics model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.550
- The paper
- Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I., & Cummings, A. (2009). Psychological ownership within the job design context: revision of the job characteristics model. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
