The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Needs–Affordances–Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media1
Abstract
The paper develops a needs–affordances–features (NAF) perspective on social media use which posits that individuals’ psychological needs motivate their use of social media applications to the extent to which these applications provide affordances that satisfy these needs. Our theoretical development builds upon two psychological theories, namely self-determination and psychological ownership, to identify five psychological needs (needs for autonomy, relatedness, competence, having a place, and self-identity), that we posit are particularly pertinent to social media use. According to NAF, these psychological needs will motivate use of those social media applications that provide salient affordances to fulfill these needs. We identify such affordances through a comprehensive review of the literature and of social media applications and put forth propositions that map the affordances to the psychological needs that they fulfill. Our theory development generates important implications. First, it has implications for social media research in that it provides an overarching comprehensive framework for the affordances of social media as a whole and the related psychological needs that motivate their use. Future studies can leverage NAF to identify psychological needs motivating the use of specific social media sites based on the affordances the sites provide, and design science research can leverage NAF in the design and bundling of specific social media features to engage users. Second, it has implications for technology acceptance research in that NAF can enrich existing models by opening up the mechanisms through which psychological needs influence user perceptions of social media and their use patterns and behaviors. Finally, NAF provides a new lens and common vocabulary for future studies, which we hope can stimulate cumulative research endeavors to develop a comprehensive framework of information systems affordances in general and the psychological needs that information systems satisfy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Maslow, A. H. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054346 · Cited by 21,563 · cited 1×
“Thus, the need for relatedness involves both receiving and giving love and care (Maslow 1943) and people tend to prefer relationships in which this is mutual (Baumeister and Leary 1995; Clark et al. 1987; Hays 1985).”
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875 · cited 7×
“…fulfill their autonomy need by enabling individuals to freely choose what to share (e.g., Halpem and Gibbs 2013) and how to present themselves (Kaplan and Haenlein 2010), with whom to connect, what to read, listen to, or watch, to freely move around in or modify their virtual environments…”
InfluentialMotivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040934 · Cited by 5,681
Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005 · Cited by 4,970
The support of autonomy and the control of behavior.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1024 · Cited by 3,242
Cited by
Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106699 · Cited by 509
How does artificial intelligence create business agility? Evidence from chatbots
Wang, X., Lin, X., & Shao, B. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102535 · Cited by 197
From attachment to addiction: The mediating role of need satisfaction on social networking sites
Chen, A. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.034 · Cited by 169
Parent, N. (2023) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000529449 · Cited by 54
Charmaraman, L., Lynch, A. D., Richer, A. M., & Grossman, J. M. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107053 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Karahanna, E., Xu, S. X., Xu, Y., & Zhang, N. (.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2018-09-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 737-756
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2889387953
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 36.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Needs–Affordances–Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.25300/misq/2018/11492
- The paper
- Karahanna, E., Xu, S. X., Xu, Y., & Zhang, N. (. (2018). The Needs–Affordances–Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media1. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2018/11492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.