The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward culture‐sensitive theories of the work–family interface
Abstract
Due to societal trends, managing the work–family interface has become an increasingly challenging task for employees in virtually every nation. However, prior studies of this interface have mostly tested U.S.‐based theories using U.S. samples. The construct of societal or national culture, which seems likely to shape individuals' experiences of the work–family interface, has been generally unacknowledged in theories and research in the work–family literature. In this paper, we offer guidelines for the development of culture‐sensitive theories of work–family phenomena and for research to test such theories as they are developed. First, we review the few prior research attempts that have incorporated cultural considerations in some manner and identify cultural dimensions that are likely to influence the work–family interface. Second, we demonstrate how selected cultural dimensions may be incorporated into theories of work–family conflict and enrichment, two constructs that represent the negative and positive side of the work–family interface respectively, to make these theories more culture‐sensitive. Finally, we offer an ambitious agenda for future theory and research to increase understanding of cultural influences on the work–family interface. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134391 · Cited by 21,664
(2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,486
Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4132 · Cited by 5,058
Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4277352 · Cited by 4,788
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
Self-citationIndividualism and collectivism
Oetzel, J. G. (1996) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(96)83678-9 · Cited by 3,781
Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend?
Spector, P. E. (2006) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428105284955 · Cited by 3,445
All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259305 · Cited by 3,039
Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface.
Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.77.1.65 · Cited by 2,907
Cited by
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010 · Cited by 965
Casper, W. J., Vaziri, H., Wayne, J. H., DeHauw, S., & Greenhaus, J. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000259 · Cited by 348
Telework: Outcomes and Facilitators for Employees
Beauregard, T. A., Basile, K. A., & Canonico, E. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior · doi:10.1017/9781108649636.020 · Cited by 134
Park, J.-C., Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106194 · Cited by 90
Employee thriving at work: the long reach of family incivility and family support
Ren, S., Babalola, M. T., Ogbonnaya, C., Hochwarter, W. A., Akemu, O., & Agyemang‐Mintah, P. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2559 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, G. N., Francesco, A. M., & Ling, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-27
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 597-616
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2141455973
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 31.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward culture‐sensitive theories of the work–family interface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.568
- The paper
- Powell, G. N., Francesco, A. M., & Ling, Y. (2009). Toward culture‐sensitive theories of the work–family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.568
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
