The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting employee engagement in an age‐diverse retail workforce
Abstract
The news that the early retirement trend has been reversed and current older workers plan to work past conventional retirement ages has been widely heralded. Managers have been encouraged to make adjustments to differences in job conditions that are important to older workers. We use social exchange theory and the norm of reciprocity as a framework for examining six dimensions of job quality for their impact on employee engagement among several groups of older and younger workers at different points in the cycle of their careers in a large retail setting. Employees (N = 6047) were surveyed as part of a large‐scale research project. Exploratory factor analyses identified commonalities among 27 job quality variables and four reliable factors. Regression analyses estimated the relationship between four job conditions and employee engagement. Although the relative weights of the factors differed by career stage, the same factors: (1) Supervisor Support and Recognition; (2) Schedule Satisfaction; and (3) Job Clarity were significant predictors of employee engagement for all age groups; (4) Career Development was a predictor for all but the retirement‐eligible employees. Findings reveal the importance of recognizing age diversity among both young and old employees. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK.
Kahn, W. A. (1990) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256287 · Cited by 10,975
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1015630930326 · Cited by 10,014
Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement
Saks, A. M. (2006) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940610690169 · Cited by 5,577
A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438 · Cited by 2,533
A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects
GILBOA, S., SHIROM, A., FRIED, Y., & COOPER, C. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x · Cited by 1,072
Arnett, J. J. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309379.001.0001 · Cited by 254
Forever Young?: A Comparison of Age Identities in the United States and Germany
Westerhof, G. J., Barrett, A. E., & Steverink, N. (2003) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027503025004002 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Kim, N., & Kang, S.-W. (2017) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21802 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- James, J. B., McKechnie, S., & Swanberg, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-196
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2099925741
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting employee engagement in an age‐diverse retail workforce. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.681
- The paper
- James, J. B., McKechnie, S., & Swanberg, J. (2011). Predicting employee engagement in an age‐diverse retail workforce. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.