The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries
Abstract
Because research on team mental models is still in its formative stages, there is a need for continued conceptual development of the construct and direct empirical support linking team mental models to team outcomes. Researchers in other fields have developed concepts that are distinct from, but clearly related to team mental models, including information sharing, transactive memory, group learning, and cognitive consensus. Although these research streams currently exist in parallel with little cross‐fertilization, there is much to be gained from integration across disciplinary boundaries. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to enrich the theoretical understanding of team mental models and to broaden the empirical research base by adopting a cross‐disciplinary focus and incorporating related team knowledge domains from other literatures. Based on a synthesis of various literatures, we develop a framework that delineates the relationships among team knowledge constructs. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258441 · Cited by 5,013
Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind
Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Theories of Group Behavior · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9 · Cited by 2,700
The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Eduardo Salas, A., & Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.2.273 · Cited by 2,579
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467 · Cited by 1,850
Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639402000206 · Cited by 1,632
Self-citationShared mental models in expert team decision making.
Cannon‐Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993) · Cited by 1,545
Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory
Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167295214009 · Cited by 1,010
Toward an understanding of team performance and training.
Eduardo Salas, A., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992) · Cited by 909
Teams: Their Training and Performance
Swezey, R. W., & Salas, E. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 891
Cited by
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013773 · Cited by 1,273
Social Capital and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Urban Public Schools
Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0191 · Cited by 680
Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective
Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.01.001 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-106
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2044595850
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 21.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.86
- The paper
- Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.86
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.