Cited by 2,273Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models

Ilgen, Daniel R., Hollenbeck, John R., Johnson, Michael, Jundt, Dustin·2005·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

This review examines research and theory relevant to work groups and teams typically embedded in organizations and existing over time, although many studies reviewed were conducted in other settings, including the laboratory. Research was organized around a two-dimensional system based on time and the nature of explanatory mechanisms that mediated between team inputs and outcomes. These mechanisms were affective, behavioral, cognitive, or some combination of the three. Recent theoretical and methodological work is discussed that has advanced our understanding of teams as complex, multilevel systems that function over time, tasks, and contexts. The state of both the empirical and theoretical work is compared as to its impact on present knowledge and future directions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
517-543
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2148141559
Cited by
2,273
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 159 · 2020: 122 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 127 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 127
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
work teams, team dynamics, input-process-output model, emotional mechanisms, behavioral mechanisms, cognitive mechanisms, multilevel systems, team context
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cognition, Cooperative Behavior, Helping Behavior, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Learning, Psychology, Social, Organizational Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review