The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods
Abstract
A precipitation downscaling method is presented using precipitation from a general circulation model (GCM) as predictor. The method extends a previous method from monthly to daily temporal resolution. The simplest form of the method corrects for biases in wet-day frequency and intensity. A more sophisticated variant also takes account of flow-dependent biases in the GCM. The method is flexible and simple to implement. It is proposed here as a correction of GCM output for applications where sophisticated methods are not available, or as a benchmark for the evaluation of other downscaling methods. Applied to output from reanalyses (ECMWF, NCEP) in the region of the European Alps, the method is capable of reducing large biases in the precipitation frequency distribution, even for high quantiles. The two variants exhibit similar performances, but the ideal choice of method can depend on the GCM/reanalysis and it is recommended to test the methods in each case. Limitations of the method are found in small areas with unresolved topographic detail that influence higher-order statistics (e.g. high quantiles). When used as benchmark for three regional climate models (RCMs), the corrected reanalysis and the RCMs perform similarly in many regions, but the added value of the latter is evident for high quantiles in some small regions. Copyright © 2006 Royal Meteorological Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gudmundsson, L., Bremnes, J. B., Haugen, J. E., & Engen-Skaugen, T. (2012) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012 · Cited by 1,318
Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., & Leconte, R. (2011) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.020 · Cited by 687
Hagemann, S., Chen, C., Haerter, J. O., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., & Piani, C. (2011) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/2011jhm1336.1 · Cited by 414
Teutschbein, C., & Seibert, J. (2010) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00357.x · Cited by 357
Projected climate change in Australian marine and freshwater environments
Hobday, A. J., & Lough, J. M. (2011) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf10302 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidli, J., Frei, C., & Vidale, P. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Climatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 679-689
- ISSN
- 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0088
- OpenAlex
- W2038294068
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/joc.1287
- The paper
- Schmidli, J., Frei, C., & Vidale, P. L. (2006). Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods. International Journal of Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.