In Pursuit of Everyday Creativity
Open accessAbstract
Creativity researchers have long paid careful attention to individual creativity, beginning with studies of well‐known geniuses, and expanding to personality, biographical, cognitive, and social‐psychological studies of individual creative behavior. Little is known, however, about the everyday psychological experience and associated creative behavior in the life and work of ordinary individuals. Yet evidence is mounting that such individuals can be responsible for important instances of creativity and innovation in the world: open innovation, user innovation, and citizen innovation. Research into this phenomenon could do much to advance the study and practice of creativity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Creativity helps software teams address both everyday and major software tasks.
“Creativity helps teams address the more mundane software tasks that arise everyday as well as the more specialized but typically more infrequent tasks aimed at yielding major product advances.”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
von Hippel, E. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · Cited by 3,768 · see citing works
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367 · Cited by 2,208 · see citing works
Self-citationA Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity
Feist, G. J. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 · Cited by 2,180 · see citing works
Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences.
Galton, F. (1869) · Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1037/13474-000 · Cited by 1,950 · see citing works
Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003 · Cited by 1,395 · see citing works
Self-citationAmabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T. T., Kramer, S. J., Odomirok, P. W., & Marsh, M. R. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069464 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Self-citationThe progress principle: using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-0377 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Personality and the Realization of Creative Potential
MacKinnon, D. W. (1965) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0022403 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses
Cox, C. M., & Gillan, L. O. (1926) · Stanford University Press eBooks · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis.
Simonton, D. K. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.32.6.1119 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis.
Simonton, D. K. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1119 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Prize-based contests can provide solutions to computational biology problems
Lakhani, K. R., Boudreau, K. J., Loh, P., Bäckström, L., Baldwin, C. Y., Lonstein, E., Lydon, M., MacCormack, A., Arnaout, R., & Guinan, E. C. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2495 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
When Do User-Innovators Start Firms? A Theory of User Entrepreneurship
Shah, S., & Tripsas, M. (2016) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9439.003.0020 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Multirater assessment of creative contributions to team projects in organizations
Moneta, G. B., Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., & Kramer, S. J. (2009) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320902815312 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citation(2016) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9439.001.0001 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Creativity in local government: Definition and determinants
Kruyen, P. M., & van Genugten, M. (2017) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12332 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Meeting the Challenges of a Person-Centric Work Psychology
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01308.x · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationCameron, T., Montgomery, R. L., Moore, K., & Stewart, E. J. (2018) · Creativity Studies · doi:10.3846/23450479.2018.1428832 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anderson, R. C., Bousselot, T., Katz-Buoincontro, J., & Todd, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614774 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda
Jackson, V., Vasilescu, B., Russo, D., Ralph, P., Prikladnicki, R., Izadi, M., D’Angelo, S., Inman, S., Andrade, A., & van der Hoek, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3708523 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Amabile, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Amabile, Teresa M.
- ORCID
- Amabile, Teresa M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Creative Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 335-337
- ISSN
- 0022-0175 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-6057
- OpenAlex
- W2731588804
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Creative Behavior (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
- Keywords
- everyday creativity, individual creativity, open innovation, user innovation, citizen innovation, creative behavior, innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review