The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli: Function as a determinant for adaptive remodeling in bone
Abstract
The capacity for functional adaptation within the skeleton was studied using the functionally isolated turkey ulna preparation. The results of this study would suggest that adaptive bone remodeling is extremely sensitive to alterations in both the magnitude and distribution of the strain generated within the bone tissue. At present, it appears that a loading regime can only influence bone remodeling when it is dynamic in nature. The full osteogenic potential of its influence is then achieved after only an extremely short exposure to this stimulus. The potency of the stimulus appears to be proportional to the magnitude of the strain engendered. As strain levels that are acceptable in one location induce adaptive remodeling in others, it would appear that each region of each bone is “genetically programmed” to accept a particular amount and pattern of intermittent strain as “normal.” Deviation from this “optimal strain enviroment” will stimulate changes in the bone's remodeling balance, resulting in adaptive increases or decreases in its mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology
Clarke, B. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.04151206 · Cited by 2,192
Verschueren, S. M., Roelants, M., Delecluse, C., Swinnen, S., Vanderschueren, D., & Boonen, S. (2004) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.0301245 · Cited by 833
From space to Earth: Advances in human physiology from 20 years of bed rest studies (1986–2006)
Pavy-Le Traon, A., Heer, M., Narici, M. V., Rittweger, J., & Vernikos, J. (2007) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0474-z · Cited by 658
Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone
Pattin, C. A., Caler, W. E., & Carter, D. R. (1996) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(94)00156-1 · Cited by 442
Bone mineral density of female athletes in different sports
Heinonen, A., Oja, P., Kannus, P., Sievänen, H., Mänttäri, A., & Vuori, I. (1993) · Bone and Mineral · doi:10.1016/s0169-6009(08)80086-4 · Cited by 206
The association between athletic training time and the sagittal curvature of the immature spine
Wojtys, E. M., Ashton-Miller, J. A., Huston, L. J., & Moga, P. J. (2000) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465000280040801 · Cited by 195
Recovery of muscle atrophy and bone loss from 90 days bed rest: Results from a one-year follow-up
Rittweger, J., & Felsenberg, D. (2009) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2008.10.044 · Cited by 120
Musculoskeletal effects of 5 days of bed rest with and without locomotion replacement training
Mulder, E., Clément, G., Linnarsson, D., Paloski, W. H., Wuyts, F. P., Zange, J., Frings-Meuthen, P., Johannes, B., Shushakov, V., Grunewald, M., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-014-3045-0 · Cited by 53
Nutrition for Older Athletes: Focus on Sex-Differences
Strasser, B., Pesta, D., Rittweger, J., Burtscher, J., & Burtscher, M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13051409 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubin, C. T., & Lanyon, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 300-310
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2018862287
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
