The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immunolocalization and expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in fracture healing
Abstract
Recently, it has become increasingly evident that fracture healing involves a complex interaction of many local and systemic regulatory factors. The roles of some of these growth factors have been described; however, little is understood about the presence of the bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture repair, despite the fact that they are the most potent osteoinductive proteins known. This study defines and characterizes the physiologic presence, localization, and chronology of the bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture healing with an established rat fracture healing model. With use of a recently developed monoclonal antibody against bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 developed with standard avidin‐biotin complex/immunoperoxidase protocols, frozen undecalcified fracture calluses were analyzed semiquantitatively for the percentage of various types of fracture cells staining positively. During the early stages of fracture healing, only a minimum number of primitive cells stained positively in the fracture callus. As the process of endochondral ossification proceeded, the presence of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 increased dramatically, especially in the primitive mesenchymal and chondrocytic cells. While the cartilaginous component of the callus matured with a concomitant decrease in the number of primitive cells, there was a concomitant decrease in both the intensity and the number of positively staining cells. As osteoblasts started to lay down woven bone on the chondroid matrix, these osteoblastic cells exhibited strong positive staining. The intensity of this staining decreased, however, as lamellar bone replaced the primitive woven bone. A similar observation was noted for the areas of the callus undergoing intramembranous ossification. Initially, within several days after the fracture, periosteal cells and osteoblasts exhibited intense staining for bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4. As the woven bone was replaced with mature lamellar bone, this staining decreased. These data, and the awareness of the strong osteoinductive capacities of bone morphogenetic protein, suggest that bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 are important regulators of cell differentiation during fracture repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering
Burg, K. J. L., Porter, S., & Kellam, J. F. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00102-2 · Cited by 1,643
Growth factors for bone growth and repair: IGF, TGFβ and BMP
Linkhart, T. A., Mohan, S., & Baylink, D. J. (1996) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00138-x · Cited by 440
Prevention of fracture healing in rats by an inhibitor of angiogenesis
Hausman, M. R., Schaffler, M. B., & Majeska, R. J. (2001) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00608-1 · Cited by 384
Clinical Evaluation of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2
Valentin-Opran, A., Wozney, J., Csimma, C., Lilly, L., & Riedel, G. E. (2002) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-200202000-00011 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Bostrom, M. P. G., Lane, J. M., Berberian, W. S., Missri, A. A. E., Tomin, E., Weiland, A., Doty, S. B., Glaser, D., & Rosen, V. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357-367
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2055171998
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunolocalization and expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in fracture healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.1100130309
- The paper
- Bostrom, M. P. G., Lane, J. M., Berberian, W. S., Missri, A. A. E., Tomin, E., Weiland, A., Doty, S. B., Glaser, D., & Rosen, V. M. (1995). Immunolocalization and expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in fracture healing. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100130309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.