Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 646

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Depth‐dependent confined compression modulus of full‐thickness bovine articular cartilage

Schinagl, Robert M., Gurskis, Donnell, Chen, Albert C., Sah, Robert L.·1997·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the equilibrium confined compression modulus of bovine articular cartilage as it varies with depth from the articular surface. Osteochondral samples were compressed by 8, 16, 24, and 32% of the cartilage thickness and allowed to equilibrate. Intratissue displacement within the cartilage was measured with use of fluorescently labeled chondrocyte nuclei as intrinsic, fiducial markers. Axial strain was then calculated in nine sequential 125 m̈m thick cartilage layers comprising the superficial 1,125 m̈m and in a 250 m̈mm thick layer of cartilage adjacent to the cartilage‐bone interface. Adjacent osteochondral cores were also tested in confined compression to determine the equilibrium stresses required to achieve the same levels of compression. Stress‐strain data for each layer of each sample were fit to a finite deformation stress‐strain relation to determine the equilibrium confined compression modulus in each tissue layer. The compressive modulus increased significantly with depth from the articular surface and ranged from 0.079 ± 0.039 MPa in the superficial layer to 1.14 ± 0.44 MPa in the ninth layer. The deepest layer. 250 m̈m thick, had a modulus of 2.10 ± 2.69 MPa. These moduli were markedly different from the apparent “homogeneous” modulus for full‐thickness cartilage (0.38 ± 0.12 MPa) and ranged from 21 to 560% of that value. The relatively low moduli and the compression‐induced stiffening of the superficial layers suggest that these layers greatly affect the biomechanical behavior of cartilage, such as during confined compression testing. The delineation of the depth‐dependent modulus provides a basis for detailed study of the relationship between the composition, structure, and function of cartilage in such processes as aging, repair, and degeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.1100150404

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 646

Metadata

Authors
Schinagl, R. M., Gurskis, D., Chen, A. C., & Sah, R. L.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
499-506
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2057198306
Cited by
646
References
0
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depth‐dependent confined compression modulus of full‐thickness bovine articular cartilage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.1100150404
The paper
Schinagl, R. M., Gurskis, D., Chen, A. C., & Sah, R. L. (1997). Depth‐dependent confined compression modulus of full‐thickness bovine articular cartilage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100150404

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.