Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subrupture tendon fatigue damage

Open access
Fung, David T., Wang, Vincent M., Laudier, Damien M., Shine, Jean H., Basta‐Pljakic, Jelena, Jepsen, Karl J., Schaffler, Mitchell B., Flatow, Evan L.·2009·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

The mechanical and microstructural bases of tendon fatigue, by which damage accumulates and contributes to degradation, are poorly understood. To investigate the tendon fatigue process, rat flexor digitorum longus tendons were cyclically loaded (1–16 N) until reaching one of three levels of fatigue damage, defined as peak clamp‐to‐clamp strain magnitudes representing key intervals in the fatigue life: i) Low (6.0%–7.0%); ii) Moderate (8.5%–9.5%); and iii) High (11.0%–12.0%). Stiffness, hysteresis, and clamp‐to‐clamp strain were assessed diagnostically (by cyclic loading at 1–8 N) before and after fatigue loading and following an unloaded recovery period to identify mechanical parameters as measures of damage. Results showed that tendon clamp‐to‐clamp strain increased from pre‐ to post‐fatigue loading significantly and progressively with the fatigue damage level (p ≤ 0.010). In contrast, changes in both stiffness and hysteresis were significant only at the High fatigue level (p ≤ 0.043). Correlative microstructural analyses showed that Low level of fatigue was characterized by isolated, transverse patterns of kinked fiber deformations. At higher fatigue levels, tendons exhibited fiber dissociation and localized ruptures of the fibers. Histomorphometric analysis showed that damage area fraction increased significantly with fatigue level (p ≤ 0.048). The current findings characterized the sequential, microstructural events that underlie the tendon fatigue process and indicate that tendon deformation can be used to accurately assess the progression of damage accumulation in tendons. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:264–273, 2009

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.20722

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Fung, D. T., Wang, V. M., Laudier, D. M., Shine, J. H., Basta‐Pljakic, J., Jepsen, K. J., Schaffler, M. B., & Flatow, E. L.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-06
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
264-273
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2047088755
Cited by
172
References
2
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subrupture tendon fatigue damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.20722
The paper
Fung, D. T., Wang, V. M., Laudier, D. M., Shine, J. H., Basta‐Pljakic, J., Jepsen, K. J., Schaffler, M. B., & Flatow, E. L. (2009). Subrupture tendon fatigue damage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20722

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.