The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subrupture tendon fatigue damage
Open accessAbstract
The mechanical and microstructural bases of tendon fatigue, by which damage accumulates and contributes to degradation, are poorly understood. To investigate the tendon fatigue process, rat flexor digitorum longus tendons were cyclically loaded (1–16 N) until reaching one of three levels of fatigue damage, defined as peak clamp‐to‐clamp strain magnitudes representing key intervals in the fatigue life: i) Low (6.0%–7.0%); ii) Moderate (8.5%–9.5%); and iii) High (11.0%–12.0%). Stiffness, hysteresis, and clamp‐to‐clamp strain were assessed diagnostically (by cyclic loading at 1–8 N) before and after fatigue loading and following an unloaded recovery period to identify mechanical parameters as measures of damage. Results showed that tendon clamp‐to‐clamp strain increased from pre‐ to post‐fatigue loading significantly and progressively with the fatigue damage level (p ≤ 0.010). In contrast, changes in both stiffness and hysteresis were significant only at the High fatigue level (p ≤ 0.043). Correlative microstructural analyses showed that Low level of fatigue was characterized by isolated, transverse patterns of kinked fiber deformations. At higher fatigue levels, tendons exhibited fiber dissociation and localized ruptures of the fibers. Histomorphometric analysis showed that damage area fraction increased significantly with fatigue level (p ≤ 0.048). The current findings characterized the sequential, microstructural events that underlie the tendon fatigue process and indicate that tendon deformation can be used to accurately assess the progression of damage accumulation in tendons. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:264–273, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Compact bone fatigue damage—I. Residual strength and stiffness
Carter, D. R., & Hayes, W. C. (1977) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(77)90005-7 · Cited by 268
In Vitro fatigue of Human Tendons
Schechtman, H., & Bader, D. L. (1997) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00033-x · Cited by 218
Cited by
Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation
Liu, Y., Tjäderhane, L., Breschi, L., Mazzoni, A., Li, N., Mao, J., Pashley, D. H., & Tay, F. R. (2011) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034510391799 · Cited by 665
Snedeker, J. G., & Foolen, J. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.032 · Cited by 377
Barbe, M. F., Gallagher, S., Massicotte, V. S., Tytell, M., Popoff, S. N., & Barr-Gillespie, A. E. (2013) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-303 · Cited by 135
Relationships and Mechanisms Between Occupational Risk Factors and Distal Upper Extremity Disorders
Keir, P. J., Farias Zuniga, A., Mulla, D. M., & Somasundram, K. G. (2021) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819860683 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Fung, D. T., Wang, V. M., Laudier, D. M., Shine, J. H., Basta‐Pljakic, J., Jepsen, K. J., Schaffler, M. B., & Flatow, E. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 264-273
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2047088755
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subrupture tendon fatigue damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.20722
- The paper
- Fung, D. T., Wang, V. M., Laudier, D. M., Shine, J. H., Basta‐Pljakic, J., Jepsen, K. J., Schaffler, M. B., & Flatow, E. L. (2009). Subrupture tendon fatigue damage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.