Cited by 218Tendon Structure and TreatmentFatigue and fracture mechanicsElasticity and Material Modeling

In Vitro fatigue of Human Tendons

Schechtman, H., Bader, D.L.·1997·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the fatigue behaviour of human tendons in vitro. The testing was accomplished with the use of specially designed grips and the local measurement of tendon cross-sectional area. Ninety specimens prepared from Extensor digitorum longus (EDL) tendons of the foot were subjected to a cyclic square tension-tension stress waveform at physiological frequencies. The maximum tensile stress was normalised to values corresponding to prescribed levels between 10% and 90% of the calculated ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 100 MPa. The minimum stress was set at 1% of the UTS. A replication of 10 specimens per stress level allowed the use of statistical models for the distribution of fatigue life. Results followed a linear model, of form S = 101.3 - 14.8 log(N), relating the normalised stress to the median number of cycles to failure, therefore suggesting the absence of an endurance limit. The Weibull distribution was found to describe adequately the probability of failure at each stress level. A model which takes into account in vivo healing was proposed. This model was able to explain the presence of intact tendons throughout the lifetime of an individual.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00033-x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schechtman, H., & Bader, D. L.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bader, D.L.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-08
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
829-835
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065382062
Cited by
218
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
Keywords
tendon fatigue, human tendon, extensor digitorum longus, cyclic tensile loading, fatigue life distribution, Weibull distribution, fatigue limit, ultimate tensile strength, tendon healing
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Foot, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Tendons, Tensile Strength, Muscle Fatigue, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review