Cited by 25Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTendon Structure and TreatmentPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Tripeptide-copper complex GHK-Cu (II) transiently improved healing outcome in a rat model of ACL reconstruction

Open access
Fu, Sai‐Chuen, Cheuk, Yau‐Chuk, Chiu, Wai‐Yin Vivien, Yung, Shu‐Hang, Rolf, Christer G., Chan, Kai‐Ming·2015·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), the biological healing of the graft is a rate‐limiting step which can contribute to graft failure. The tripeptide–copper complex glycyl‐ L ‐histidyl‐ L ‐lysine‐Cu(II) (GHK‐Cu) is a well‐known activator of tissue remodeling. We investigated whether GHK‐Cu can improve graft healing following ACLR. Seventy‐two rats underwent unilateral ACLR were randomized to saline, 0.3 or 3 mg/ml GHK‐Cu groups ( n = 24). Post‐operational intra‐articular injections were given from week 2, once a week, for 4 weeks. Gait analysis was performed pre‐injury and at harvesting time. At 6 or 12 weeks post‐operation, knee specimens were harvested for knee laxity test, graft pull‐out test, and histology. At 6 weeks post‐ACLR, GHK‐Cu groups resulted in a smaller side‐to‐side difference in knee laxity as compared to the saline group ( p = 0.009), but there was no significant difference at 12 weeks post‐operation. The graft complex in the 0.3 mg/ml GHK‐Cu group had higher stiffness than saline group at 6 weeks post‐operation ( p = 0.026), but there was no significant difference in ultimate load, gait parameters, and histological scores among treatment groups. All grafts failed mid‐substance during pull‐out test. Intra‐articular supplementation with a bioactive small molecule GHK‐Cu improved graft healing following ACLR in rat, but the beneficial effects could not last as treatment discontinued. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:1024–1033, 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.22831

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GHK-Cu enhances osteoblastic cell attachment.

    “Moreover, GHK-Cu promotes bone healing and enhances osteoblastic cell attachment, potentially through the increase in collagen synthesis [14–15].”

    From The potential of GHK as an anti-aging peptide (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

    The paper’s introductory passage says GHK-Cu can enhance attachment of an implant to bone, and its References list a study on osteoblastic cell attachment. The paper does not itself state or test that GHK-Cu enhances osteoblastic cell attachment; its own ACL-reconstruction results concern graft and bone-tunnel healing. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GHK-Cu promotes bone healing.

    “Moreover, GHK-Cu promotes bone healing and enhances osteoblastic cell attachment, potentially through the increase in collagen synthesis [14–15].”

    From The potential of GHK as an anti-aging peptide (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, S., Cheuk, Y., Chiu, W. V., Yung, S., Rolf, C. G., & Chan, K.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China
Corresponding author
Chan, Kai‐Ming
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
1024-1033
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W1912900577
Cited by
25
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR (CUHK 460611)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
GHK-Cu, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, graft healing, graft failure, tissue remodeling, intra-articular injection, knee laxity, graft stiffness, rat model
MeSH terms
Animals, Gait, Injections, Intra-Articular, Joint Instability, Male, Oligopeptides, Random Allocation, Wound Healing, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Transplants, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review