The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacteria antibiotic resistance: New challenges and opportunities for implant‐associated orthopedic infections
Open accessAbstract
There has been a dramatic increase in the emergence of antibiotic‐resistant bacterial strains, which has made antibiotic choices for infection control increasingly limited and more expensive. In the U.S. alone, antibiotic‐resistant bacteria cause at least 2 million infections and 23,000 deaths a year resulting in a $55–70 billion per year economic impact. Antibiotics are critical to the success of surgical procedures including orthopedic prosthetic surgeries, and antibiotic resistance is occurring in nearly all bacteria that infect people, including the most common bacteria that cause orthopedic infections, such as Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Most clinical cases of orthopedic surgeries have shown that patients infected with antibiotic‐resistant bacteria, such as methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA), are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This paper reviews the severity of antibiotic resistance at the global scale, the consequences of antibiotic resistance, and the pathways bacteria used to develop antibiotic resistance. It highlights the opportunities and challenges in limiting antibiotic resistance through approaches like the development of novel, non‐drug approaches to reduce bacteria functions related to orthopedic implant‐associated infections. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:22–32, 2018.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs
DiMasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G., & Hansen, R. W. (2016) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012 · Cited by 3,359
Antibiotic resistance is ancient
D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., Froese, D., Zazula, G., Calmels, F., Debruyne, R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10388 · Cited by 2,720
Cited by
Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications and Costs
Dadgostar, P. (2019) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s234610 · Cited by 2,024
Wang, R., Shi, M., Xu, F., Qiu, Y., Zhang, P., Shen, K., Zhao, Q., Yu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18267-1 · Cited by 441
Surface Design for Antibacterial Materials: From Fundamentals to Advanced Strategies
Li, W., Thian, E. S., Wang, M., Wang, Z., & Ren, L. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202100368 · Cited by 429
(2021) · doi:10.3322/caac.21697 · Cited by 201
Medina Cruz, D., Tien-Street, W., Zhang, B., Huang, X., Vernet Crua, A., Nieto-Argüello, A., Cholula-Díaz, J. L., Martínez, L., Huttel, Y., González, M. U., et al. (2019) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9gc00131j · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, B., & Webster, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-32
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2751994003
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 74.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteria antibiotic resistance: New challenges and opportunities for implant‐associated orthopedic infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.23656
- The paper
- Li, B., & Webster, T. J. (2018). Bacteria antibiotic resistance: New challenges and opportunities for implant‐associated orthopedic infections. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.