Cited by 52Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchDental Research and COVID-19

Relationship among clinical periodontal, microbiologic parameters and lung function in participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Tan, Lisi, Tang, Xiaolin, Pan, Chunling, Wang, Hongyan, Pan, Yaping·2019·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship among clinical periodontal, microbiologic parameters and lung function in participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A total of 160 participants were recruited, including 80 participants with COPD (COPD group) and 80 participants without COPD (control group). All participants completed questionnaires and underwent clinical periodontal and lung function examinations. Subgingival plaques were obtained to determine the prevalence of selected oral and respiratory bacterial species. RESULTS: 1) Significant relationships were noted in the participants among oral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S), clinical attachment level (CAL) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%). 2) Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Klebsiella pneumonia (Kp), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) and Streptococcus pneumonia (Sp) prevalence was increased in participants with COPD compared with control participants. 3) A significant negative association was noted between the relative content of Pg and FEV1% in participants with COPD. CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirm that periodontal destruction and oral pathogens are associated with lung function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jper.17-0705

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased levels of P. gingivalis are detected in the subgingival plaque.

    “Mounting evidence suggests that oral streptococci can be detected from the lungs of COPD patients (Pragman et al., 2018) with increased levels of P. gingivalis detected in the subgingival plaque (Tan et al., 2019).”

    From Oral Microbiome and SARS-CoV-2: Beware of Lung Co-infection (2020) · cites this paper as Tan et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, L., Tang, X., Pan, C., Wang, H., & Pan, Y.
Affiliations
China Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Pan, Yaping
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-19
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
134-140
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2887480903
Cited by
52
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Nature Science Foundation of China (81271153, 81700970)
  • Nature Science Foundation of Liaoning province (20170541049)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, periodontal disease, lung function, subgingival plaque, oral microbiota, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, oral hygiene, clinical attachment level, FEV1
MeSH terms
Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Oral Hygiene Index, Respiratory Function Tests, Periodontal Attachment Loss, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review