The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of Array Interspacing on the Force Required for Successful Microneedle Skin Penetration: Theoretical and Practical Approaches
Open accessAbstract
Insertion behaviour of microneedle (MN) arrays depends upon the mechanical properties of the skin and, MN geometry and distribution in an array. In addressing this issue, this paper studies MN array insertion mechanism into skin and provides a simple quantitative basis to relate the insertion force with distance between two MNs. The presented framework is based on drawing an analogy between a beam on an elastic foundation and mechanism of needle insertion, where insertion force is separated into different components. A theoretical analysis indicates that insertion force decreases as interspacing increases. For a specified skin type, insertion force decreased from 0.029 to 0.028 N/MN when interspacing at MN tip was increased from 50 μm (350 μm at MN base) to 150 μm (450 μm at MN base). However, dependence of insertion force seems to decrease as the interspacing is increased beyond 150 μm. To assess the validity of the proposed model, a series of experiments was carried out to determine the force required for skin insertion of MN. Experiments performed at insertion speed of 0.5 and 1.0 mm/s yielded insertion force values of 0.030 and 0.0216 N, respectively, for 30 μm interspacing at MN base (330 μm interspacing at tip) and 0.028 and 0.0214 N, respectively, for 600 μm interspacing at MN base (900 μm interspacing at tip). Results from theoretical analysis and finite element modelling agree well with experimental results, which show MN interspacing only begins to affect insertion force at low interspacing (<150 μm interspacing at MN base). This model provides a framework for optimising MN devices, and should aid development of suitable application method and determination of force for reliable insertion into skin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Makvandi, P., Kirkby, M., Hutton, A. R. J., Shabani, M., Yiu, C. K. Y., Baghbantaraghdari, Z., Jamaledin, R., Carlotti, M., Mazzolai, B., Mattoli, V., et al. (2021) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-021-00611-9 · Cited by 455
Self-citationCardiac cell–integrated microneedle patch for treating myocardial infarction
Tang, J., Wang, J., Huang, K., Ye, Y., Su, T., Qiao, L., Hensley, M. T., Caranasos, T. G., Zhang, J., Gu, Z., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat9365 · Cited by 316
Core–Shell Microneedle Gel for Self-Regulated Insulin Delivery
Wang, J., Ye, Y., Yu, J., Kahkoska, A. R., Zhang, X., Wang, C., Sun, W., Corder, R. D., Chen, Z., Khan, S. A., et al. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b08152 · Cited by 299
Microneedles as the technique of drug delivery enhancement in diverse organs and tissues
Rzhevskiy, A. S., Singh, T. R. R., Donnelly, R. F., & Anissimov, Y. G. (2018) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.048 · Cited by 266
Self-citationMicroneedle-mediated transdermal drug delivery for treating diverse skin diseases
Yang, D., Chen, M., Sun, Y., Jin, Y., Lu, C., Pan, X., Quan, G., & Wu, C. (2021) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.004 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Olatunji, O., Das, D. B., Garland, M. J., Belaid, L., & Donnelly, R. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1209-1221
- ISSN
- 0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038815967
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Array Interspacing on the Force Required for Successful Microneedle Skin Penetration: Theoretical and Practical Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jps.23439
- The paper
- Olatunji, O., Das, D. B., Garland, M. J., Belaid, L., & Donnelly, R. F. (2013). Influence of Array Interspacing on the Force Required for Successful Microneedle Skin Penetration: Theoretical and Practical Approaches. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.