Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engineering Microneedle Patches for Improved Penetration: Analysis, Skin Models and Factors Affecting Needle Insertion

Open access
Makvandi, Pooyan, Kirkby, Melissa, Hutton, Aaron R. J., Shabani, Majid, Yiu, Cynthia K. Y., Baghbantaraghdari, Zahra, Jamaledin, Rezvan, Carlotti, Marco, Mazzolai, Barbara, Mattoli, Virgilio, Donnelly, Ryan F.·2021·Nano-Micro Letters

Abstract

Transdermal microneedle (MN) patches are a promising tool used to transport a wide variety of active compounds into the skin. To serve as a substitute for common hypodermic needles, MNs must pierce the human stratum corneum (~ 10 to 20 µm), without rupturing or bending during penetration. This ensures that the cargo is released at the predetermined place and time. Therefore, the ability of MN patches to sufficiently pierce the skin is a crucial requirement. In the current review, the pain signal and its management during application of MNs and typical hypodermic needles are presented and compared. This is followed by a discussion on mechanical analysis and skin models used for insertion tests before application to clinical practice. Factors that affect insertion (e.g., geometry, material composition and cross-linking of MNs), along with recent advancements in developed strategies (e.g., insertion responsive patches and 3D printed biomimetic MNs using two-photon lithography) to improve the skin penetration are highlighted to provide a backdrop for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40820-021-00611-9

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 163 references

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Makvandi, P., Kirkby, M., Hutton, A. R. J., Shabani, M., Yiu, C. K. Y., Baghbantaraghdari, Z., Jamaledin, R., Carlotti, M., Mazzolai, B., Mattoli, V., & Donnelly, R. F.
Venue
Nano-Micro Letters
Published
2021-03-16
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
93-93
ISSN
  • 2150-5551 (ISSN-L)
  • 2311-6706
OpenAlex
W3152604448
Cited by
455
References
163
FWCI
21.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering Microneedle Patches for Improved Penetration: Analysis, Skin Models and Factors Affecting Needle Insertion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s40820-021-00611-9
The paper
Makvandi, P., Kirkby, M., Hutton, A. R. J., Shabani, M., Yiu, C. K. Y., Baghbantaraghdari, Z., Jamaledin, R., Carlotti, M., Mazzolai, B., Mattoli, V., & Donnelly, R. F. (2021). Engineering Microneedle Patches for Improved Penetration: Analysis, Skin Models and Factors Affecting Needle Insertion. Nano-Micro Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00611-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.