Cited by 48Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsAnimal testing and alternativesPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

In Vitro–In Vivo Extrapolation Method to Predict Human Renal Clearance of Drugs

Kunze, Annett, Huwyler, Jörg, Poller, Birk, Gutmann, Heike, Camenisch, Gian·2014·Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

Renal clearance is a key determinant of the elimination of drugs. To date, only few in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) approaches have been described to predict the renal organ clearance as the net result of glomerular filtration, tubular secretion, and tubular reabsorption. In this study, we measured in LLC-PK1 cells the transport of 20 compounds that cover all four classes of the Biopharmaceutical Drug Disposition System. These data were incorporated into a novel kidney model to predict all renal clearance processes in human. We showed that filtration and secretion were main contributors to the renal organ clearance for all compounds, whereas reabsorption was predominant for compounds assigned to classes 1 and 2. Our results suggest that anionic drugs were not significantly secreted in LLC-PK1 cells, resulting in under-predicted clearances. When all study compounds were included a high overall correlation between the reported and predicted renal organ clearances was obtained (R² = 0.83). The prediction accuracy in terms of percentage within twofold and threefold error was 70% and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, our novel IVIVE method allowed to predict the human renal organ clearance and the contribution of each underlying process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jps.23851

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunze, A., Huwyler, J., Poller, B., Gutmann, H., & Camenisch, G.
Affiliations
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Camenisch, Gian
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
994-1001
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105151902
Cited by
48
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, renal clearance, glomerular filtration, renal tubular secretion, tubular reabsorption, LLC-PK1 cells, kidney model, anionic drugs
MeSH terms
Absorption, Algorithms, Animals, Biological Transport, Cell Membrane Permeability, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney, Kidney Tubules, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Models, Biological, Permeability, Pharmacokinetics, Swine, Reproducibility of Results, LLC-PK1 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review