Cited by 337Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

EVALUATION OF DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION IN THE HEPATOBILIARY AND RENAL TRANSPORT OF DRUGS

Shitara, Yoshihisa, Sato, Hitoshi, Sugiyama, Yuichi·2005·Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed the import role played by transporters in the renal and hepatobiliary excretion of many drugs. These transporters exhibit a broad substrate specificity with a degree of overlap, suggesting the possibility of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions with other substrates. This review is an overview of the roles of transporters and the possibility of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions. Among the large number of transporters, we compare the Ki values of inhibitors for organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) and organic anion transporters (OATs) and their therapeutic unbound concentrations. Among them, cephalosporins and probenecid have the potential to produce clinically relevant OAT-mediated drug-drug interactions, whereas cyclosporin A and rifampicin may trigger OATP-mediated ones. These drugs have been reported to cause drug-drug interactions in vivo with OATs or OATP substrates, suggesting the possibility of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions. To avoid adverse consequences of such transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions, we need to be more aware of the role played by drug transporters as well as those caused by drug metabolizing enzymes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121444

Cites

199 of 199 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shitara, Y., Sato, H., & Sugiyama, Y.
Affiliations
  • SHOWA Medical University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Published
2005-09-22
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
689-723
ISSN
  • 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4304
OpenAlex
W2066382275
Cited by
336
References
199
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 25
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
drug-drug interactions, drug transporters, renal drug excretion, organic anion transporting polypeptides, organic anion transporters, transporter inhibitors, Ki values, substrate specificity, probenecid, cephalosporins, cyclosporine, rifampicin, drug-metabolizing enzymes
MeSH terms
Animals, Biliary Tract, Biological Transport, Drug Evaluation, Drug Interactions, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Kidney, Liver

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review