Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A 10 Be production‐rate calibration for the Arctic

YOUNG, NICOLÁs E., SCHAEFER, JOERG M., BRINER, JASON P., GOEHRING, BRENT M.·2013·Journal of Quaternary Science

Abstract

We present a Baffin Bay 10 Be production‐rate calibration derived from glacial deposits in western Greenland and Baffin Island, and test our results against published 10 Be calibration datasets to develop an Arctic 10 Be production rate. Our calibration comprises: (i) 10 Be measurements from moraine boulders linked to a 14 C‐dated moraine at Jakobshavn Isfjord in western Greenland, (ii) an independent and previously published 10 Be production rate at Jakobshavn Isfjord and (iii) re‐measured 10 Be concentrations from a Baffin Island calibration site that is included in the north‐eastern North America dataset. Combined, we calculate a sea‐level/high‐latitude 10 Be production rate for the Baffin Bay region of 3.96 ± 0.07 atoms g −1 a −1 (Lal/Stone scaling model). After testing the Baffin Bay rate against calibration sites in Norway and north‐eastern North America, we calculate a more conservative Arctic production rate of 3.96 ± 0.15 atoms g −1 a −1 . The Baffin Bay and Arctic 10 Be production rates are indistinguishable from the north‐eastern North America 10 Be production rate (3.91 ± 0.19 atoms g −1 a −1 ) and yield overall uncertainties of <2–3.7% (1σ). These production rates reduce systematic uncertainties in 10 Be‐based chronologies of ice‐margin change and allow 10 Be‐based chronologies to be more confidently compared with high‐resolution climate records, such as those from Greenland ice cores.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jqs.2642

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.11.003 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.quageo.2008.09.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.quageo.2007.12.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/382241a0 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ngeo556 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/jqs.1057 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.09.005 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/jqs.1562 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.04.001 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.03.051 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00503-9 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/jqs.994 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.quageo.2011.04.005 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/jqs.1517 · DOI
  15. 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0877:PCBMIW>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gosse J, 1996, Production rate of in‐situ cosmogenic 10Be in quartz at high altitude and mid latitude, Radiocarbon, 38, 154
  17. 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00171-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00641-6 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00640-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.0435-3676.1999.00060.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.06.018 · DOI
  22. 10.1006/qres.2002.2352 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90401-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.114 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00153-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.11.018 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90220-C · DOI
  28. LarsenP.1996.In‐situ production rates of cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al over the past 21 500 years determined from the terminal moraine of the Laurentide Ice Sheet north‐central New Jersey. MS thesis University of Vermont.
  29. 10.1126/science.1175010 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.01.021 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.07.001 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.07.024 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/jqs.1516 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.002 · DOI
  35. Nesje A., 2002, A large rockfall avalanche in Oldedalen, inner Nordfjord, western Norway, dated by means of a sub‐avalanche Salix sp.tree trunk, Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 82, 59
  36. NishiizumiK.2002.10Be 26Al 36Cl and 41Ca AMS standards: abstract O16‐1. In: 9th Conference on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (September 9–13 2002 Nagoya Japan) p. 130.
  37. 10.1029/96JB02270 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.297 · DOI
  39. 10.1029/JB094iB12p17907 · DOI
  40. 10.1146/annurev.earth.32.082503.144359 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.quageo.2009.12.001 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/ngeo962 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/ngeo1548 · DOI
  44. 10.2475/07.2012.01 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.016 · DOI
  46. 10.1126/science.1169312 · DOI
  47. 10.1029/2005JB003811 · DOI
  48. 10.1029/2000JB900181 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1126/science.1077998 · DOI
  50. 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0587:EDAVOP>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  51. Weidick A., 1968, Observations on some Holocene glacier fluctuations in West Greenland, Meddelelser om Grønland, 165, 202
  52. Weidick A, 2007, Quaternary glaciation history and glaciology of Jakobshavn Isbræ and the Disko Bugt region, West Greenland: a review, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin, 14, 1, 10.34194/geusb.v14.4985 · DOI
  53. 10.1029/2011GL049639 · DOI
  54. 10.1126/science.1222759 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.09.028 · DOI
  56. 10.1130/G31399.1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
YOUNG, N. E., SCHAEFER, J. M., BRINER, J. P., & GOEHRING, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Lamont‐Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University Palisades NY 10964 USA
  • Department of Geology University at Buffalo Buffalo NY USA
  • Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA
Venue
Journal of Quaternary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
515-526
ISSN
  • 0267-8179
  • 1099-1417
Cited by
220
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • US National Science Foundation (NSF-BCS 0752848, NSF-BCS 1002597)
  • J. M. S. acknowledges the Comer Science and Educational Foundation, the Lamont Climate Center and NSF-EAR (03-45865)
  • LDEO

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review