The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution
Open accessAbstract
We have many useful frameworks for formulating business strategy, i.e., devising a theory of how to compete. Frameworks for strategy execution are comparatively fragmented and idiosyncratic. This paper proposes a business model framework to link the firm's theory about how to compete to its execution. The framework captures previous ideas about business models in a simple logical structure that reflects current thinking in strategy. The framework is a useful tool for the strategist, for teaching, and for research on business models in strategy. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations
Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446 · Cited by 919
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Afuah A, 2001, Internet Business Models and Strategies
- 10.1002/smj.187 · DOI · Paper page
- Barney JB, 2002, Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage
- 10.1093/icc/11.3.529 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/tie.1036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI · Paper page
- Hamel G, 2000, Leading the Revolution
- Hamel G, 2003, The quest for resilience, Harvard Business Review, 81, 52
- Hill CWL, 2001, Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach
- 10.2307/41166053 · DOI · Paper page
- Magretta J, 2002, Why business models matter, Harvard Business Review, 80, 86
- OsterwalderA PigneurY.2002.An e‐business model ontology for modeling e‐business. Proceedings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference Bled Slovenia pp.1–12.
- PeterovicO KittlC TekstenRD.2001.Developing business models for e‐business. Paper presented at the International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2001 Vienna.
- Porter ME, 1980, Competitive Strategy
- Porter ME, 1985, Competitive Advantage
- Porter ME, 1996, What is strategy?, Harvard Business Review, 74, 61
- Porter ME, 2001, Strategy and the internet, Harvard Business Review, 79, 62
- Rayport JF, 2001, e‐Commerce
- 10.1080/10196789800000016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.0955-6419.2004.00308.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 · Cited by 4,366
Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches
Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036 · Cited by 1,143
Circular business models: a review
Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Soufani, K. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741 · Cited by 1,089
A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability
Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z · Cited by 995
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, J.
- Venue
- Strategic Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 133-144
- ISSN
- 1086-1718 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1697
- OpenAlex
- W3034253356
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jsc.821
- The paper
- Richardson, J. (2008). The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strategic Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
