Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Potential allergenicity of Medicago sativa investigated by a combined IgE‐binding inhibition, proteomics and in silico approach

Yakhlef, Marwa, Giangrieco, Ivana, Ciardiello, Maria A, Fiume, Immacolata, Mari, Adriano, Souiki, Lynda, Pocsfalvi, Gabriella·2021·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) is one of the most planted crops worldwide primarily used to feed animals. The use of alfalfa in human diet as sprouts, infusions and nutritional supplements is rapidly gaining popularity. Despite this, allergenicity assessment of this novel plant food is largely lacking. RESULTS: Here, leaf protein extract of alfalfa was studied using a combined proteomics, Immunoglobulin E (IgE)‐binding inhibition assay and in silico approach to find potential allergens. We have identified and annotated 129 proteins using in‐gel digestion proteomics and Blast2Go suit. A search against COMPARE database, using the identified proteins as query sequences, revealed high similarity with several allergenic proteins. The Single Point Highest Inhibition Achievable assay (SPHIAa) performed on the multiplex FABER® allergy testing system confirmed the in silico results and showed some additional potential allergens. This approach allowed the detection of proteins in alfalfa leaves cross‐reacting with plant allergens from three different allergen families such as lipid transfer, thaumatin‐like and Bet v 1‐like protein families. In addition, the absence of structural determinants cross‐reacting with seed storage allergenic proteins and with animal allergens was recorded. CONCLUSION: This study reports for the first time potential allergenic proteins in alfalfa. The results suggest that this plant food can be safely introduced, as a protein‐rich supplement, in the diet of patients allergic to animal food allergens. Allergic patients towards certain plant food allergens need to be careful about consuming alfalfa because they might have allergic symptoms. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.10730

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1186/s40413-018-0198-z · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.pcl.2019.06.002 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/ACI.0b013e328360949d · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.06.003 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1084/jem.183.2.599 · DOI
  7. 10.1067/mai.2000.106929 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/s13601-020-00329-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70167-3 · DOI
  10. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01389 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.075 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.07.023 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02277.x · DOI
  14. Apostol L, 2017, Alfalfa concentrate – a RICH source of nutrients for use in food products, J Int Sci Publ, 5, 66
  15. 10.1108/00070701311317865 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.hermed.2017.07.002 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cj.2018.01.006 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.026 · DOI
  19. 10.3390/ijms19092498 · DOI
  20. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01502 · DOI
  21. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00242 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41598-018-27935-8 · DOI
  23. Gao Y, 2019, Comparative proteomic analysis reveals that antioxidant system and soluble sugar metabolism contribute to salt tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) leaves, J Proteome Res, 18, 191
  24. 10.1186/s12870-018-1492-1 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63205-X · DOI
  26. Bener A, 2002, An analysis of skin prick test reactions in asthmatics in a hot climate and desert environment, Allerg Immunol, 34, 281
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03129.x · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.03.003 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.02.012 · DOI
  30. 10.1155/2008/619832 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027856 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.02.025 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/s13601-017-0158-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.05.007 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.09.009 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nprot.2006.468 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nmeth1113 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Sahu SS, 2019, Plant‐mSubP: a computational framework for the prediction of single and multi‐target protein subcellular localization using integrated machine‐learning approaches, AoB Plants, 12, 1
  39. 10.1074/jbc.M010337200 · DOI
  40. 10.1159/000144036 · DOI
  41. 10.3389/fpls.2018.01916 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.biochi.2016.06.006 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.03.013 · DOI
  44. Cerecedo I, 2014, The impact of double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) on the socioeconomic cost of food allergy in Europe, J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 24, 418
  45. 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32832d9049 · DOI
  46. Slavokhotova AA, 2017, Hevein‐like antimicrobial peptides of plants, Biochemistry, 82, 1659
  47. 10.1080/1547691X.2018.1533904 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03312.x · DOI
  49. 10.1002/bip.22530 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yakhlef, M., Giangrieco, I., Ciardiello, M. A., Fiume, I., Mari, A., Souiki, L., & Pocsfalvi, G.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire de Biologie, Eau et Environnement, Department of Biology, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie et Sciences de la Terre et l'Univers Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma Guelma Algeria
  • Institute of Biosciences and BioResources National Research Council Naples Italy
  • Allergy Data Laboratories (ADL) Latina Italy
  • Department of Biology, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie et Sciences de la Terre et l'Univers Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma Guelma Algeria
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
1182-1192
ISSN
  • 0022-5142
  • 1097-0010
Cited by
17
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review