The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyses of tomato peel and seed byproducts and their use as a source of carotenoids
Abstract
Commercial tomato canning yields two different byproducts. One is the material that results from peeling tomatoes, while the other results from removing the seeds. The peel byproduct contained 100.8 g protein, 256.4 g ash and 299.4 g acid detergent fiber kg−1. Ash content was high because the peel byproduct contained 83.8 g kg−1 sodium as a result of using a sodium hydroxide solution to peel the tomatoes. The seed byproduct contained 202.3 g protein, 51.8 g ash, and 537.9 g acid detergent fiber kg−1. An amino acid analysis of seeds indicated that approximately 60% of the protein results from amino acids. Both byproducts were analyzed for carotenoid content. The lycopene content of peel byproduct was 734 µg g−1 of dry material. Significant amounts of lutein, β‐carotene, and cis‐β‐carotene were also present. Seed byproduct contained 130 µg lycopene kg−1 of dry matter. The content of other carotenoids was approximately half of that present in the peels. Peel and seed byproducts were included at 75 g kg−1 in hen diets to determine the transfer of carotenoids to the yolk. When fed at this concentration, the lycopene content of dry egg yolk was approximately 0.9 µg g−1. Approximately 0.1% of the lycopene in peel byproduct and approximately 0.7% of the lycopene in the seed byproduct was transferred from the feed to the yolk. Lycopene appears more similar to carotene than to oxycarotenoids in its transfer to the yolk. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
O'Shea, N., Arendt, E. K., & Gallagher, E. (2012) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2012.06.002 · Cited by 416
Bioactive potential of fruit and vegetable wastes
(2020) · Advances in Food and Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/bs.afnr.2019.07.001 · Cited by 317
Bioactive Compounds Extracted from Tomato Processing by-Products as a Source of Valuable Nutrients
Szabo, K., Cătoi, A.-F., & Vodnar, D. C. (2018) · Plant Foods for Human Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s11130-018-0691-0 · Cited by 231
Pataro, G., Carullo, D., Falcone, M., & Ferrari, G. (2020) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102369 · Cited by 185
Čolović, D., Rakita, S., Banjac, V., Đuragić, O., & Čabarkapa, I. (2019) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2019.1573431 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Knoblich, M., Anderson, B., & Latshaw, D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1166-1170
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W1996500928
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyses of tomato peel and seed byproducts and their use as a source of carotenoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jsfa.2091
- The paper
- Knoblich, M., Anderson, B., & Latshaw, D. (2005). Analyses of tomato peel and seed byproducts and their use as a source of carotenoids. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.