Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen

Makkar, Harinder P S, Blümmel, Michael, Becker, Klaus·1995·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

The rate of fermentation of hay was not affected by purified tannins from Ouercus incana and Dichostachys cinerea at 0.13 mg ml−1 of the in vitro medium whereas a decrease of 4% in the rate was observed for Acioa barteri tannins at this level. At 0.23 mg and 0.47 mg of tannins per ml, the decrease in rate varied from 4 to 13% and 13 to 20%, respectively. The decrease in in vitro true digestibility of dry matter was 3, 6 and 7% for Q incana, D cinerea and A barteri, respectively, at a tannin concentration of 0.47 mg ml−1, and 17, 21 and 27%, respectively, at 0.93 mg ml−1. There was no change in the potential extent of digestion up to 0.47 mg ml−1 for any of the tannins studied. These results suggested that the rate of digestion is affected to a greater extent than the potential extent of digestion or the in vitro true digestibility and that different tannins even at the same level have different degrees of effect. Tannin‐saponin interactions were studied using tannic acid (TA), quebracho tannin (QT) and quillaja saponin (S) at different concentrations (0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg ml−1) alone and in combination with each other. The decrease in the rate of digestion and true digestibility was additive when both the TA and the S were present. Similar results were obtained when TA was replaced by QT except that the effects with QT were more marked as compared to TA at the same concentration. Saponins had little effect on the potential extent of digestion and true digestibility. These tannins also decreased the production of short‐chain fatty acid (SCFA) and their molar proportions (acetate decreased whereas propionate increased). Efficiency of microbial protein synthesis, expressed as the ratio of 15 N incorporation per unit of SCFA production, was higher with both S and the tannins studied. A substantial amount (71–93%) of tannins soluble in aqueous acetone was released from leaves of some trees and shrubs on incubation in the in vitro medium for 48 h. The rumen liquor was not capable of degrading oligomeric condensed tannins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.2740690413

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Makkar, H. P. S., Blümmel, M., & Becker, K.
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
481-493
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W1998890191
Cited by
289
References
33
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jsfa.2740690413
The paper
Makkar, H. P. S., Blümmel, M., & Becker, K. (1995). In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740690413

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.