The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen
Abstract
The rate of fermentation of hay was not affected by purified tannins from Ouercus incana and Dichostachys cinerea at 0.13 mg ml−1 of the in vitro medium whereas a decrease of 4% in the rate was observed for Acioa barteri tannins at this level. At 0.23 mg and 0.47 mg of tannins per ml, the decrease in rate varied from 4 to 13% and 13 to 20%, respectively. The decrease in in vitro true digestibility of dry matter was 3, 6 and 7% for Q incana, D cinerea and A barteri, respectively, at a tannin concentration of 0.47 mg ml−1, and 17, 21 and 27%, respectively, at 0.93 mg ml−1. There was no change in the potential extent of digestion up to 0.47 mg ml−1 for any of the tannins studied. These results suggested that the rate of digestion is affected to a greater extent than the potential extent of digestion or the in vitro true digestibility and that different tannins even at the same level have different degrees of effect. Tannin‐saponin interactions were studied using tannic acid (TA), quebracho tannin (QT) and quillaja saponin (S) at different concentrations (0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg ml−1) alone and in combination with each other. The decrease in the rate of digestion and true digestibility was additive when both the TA and the S were present. Similar results were obtained when TA was replaced by QT except that the effects with QT were more marked as compared to TA at the same concentration. Saponins had little effect on the potential extent of digestion and true digestibility. These tannins also decreased the production of short‐chain fatty acid (SCFA) and their molar proportions (acetate decreased whereas propionate increased). Efficiency of microbial protein synthesis, expressed as the ratio of 15 N incorporation per unit of SCFA production, was higher with both S and the tannins studied. A substantial amount (71–93%) of tannins soluble in aqueous acetone was released from leaves of some trees and shrubs on incubation in the in vitro medium for 48 h. The rumen liquor was not capable of degrading oligomeric condensed tannins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutritional ecology of the ruminant
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4505 · Cited by 7,757
A TWO‐STAGE TECHNIQUE FOR THE IN VITRO DIGESTION OF FORAGE CROPS
Tilley, J. M. A., & Terry, R. A. (1963) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x · Cited by 6,609
Ørskov, E. R., & McDonald, I. (1979) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600063048 · Cited by 4,735
(1966) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12555-x · Cited by 2,414
The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin
Porter, L. J., Hrstich, L. N., & Chan, B. G. (1985) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)94533-3 · Cited by 2,158
Makkar, H. P. S., Blümmel, M., Borowy, N. K., & Becker, K. (1993) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740610205 · Cited by 1,216
Self-citationProtein precipitation method for the quantitative determination of tannins
Hagerman, A. E., & Butler, L. G. (1978) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf60218a027 · Cited by 961
Makkar, H. P. S., Blümmel, M., & Becker, K. (1995) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19950095 · Cited by 613
Self-citationPlant polyphenols; Vegetable tannins revisited
(1990) · International Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0020-711x(90)90217-q · Cited by 556
Tannins: their adverse role in ruminant nutrition
Kumar, R., & Singh, M. (1984) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf00123a006 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Polyphenols: Chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance
Bravo, L. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01670.x · Cited by 4,030
Francis, G., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (2001) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(01)00526-9 · Cited by 2,320
Self-citationMakkar, H. P. S. (2003) · Small Ruminant Research · doi:10.1016/s0921-4488(03)00142-1 · Cited by 1,159
Self-citationCarulla, J. E., Kreuzer, M., Machmüller, A., & Hess, H. D. (2005) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar05022 · Cited by 447
Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites
Bodas, R., Prieto, N., García-González, R., Andrés, S., Giráldez, F. J., & López, S. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.010 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Makkar, H. P. S., Blümmel, M., & Becker, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 481-493
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W1998890191
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jsfa.2740690413
- The paper
- Makkar, H. P. S., Blümmel, M., & Becker, K. (1995). In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740690413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.