The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A method is proposed for estimating the percentage of dietary protein that is degraded by microbial action in the rumen when protein supplement is added to a specified ration. The potential degradability, p, is measured by incubating the supplement in artificial-fibre bags in the rumen and is related to incubation time, t, by the equation p = a+b(1 – e-ct). The rate constant k, measuring the passage of the supplement from the rumen to the abomasum, is obtained in a separate experiment in which the supplement is combined with a chromium marker which renders it completely indigestible. The effective percentage degradation, p, of the supplement, allowing for rate of passage, is shown to be p = a+[bc/(c+k)] (1-e-(e+k)t) by time, t, after feeding. As t increases, this tends to the asymptotic value a+bc/(c+k), which therefore provides an estimate of the degradability of the protein supplement under the specified feeding conditions. The method is illustrated by results obtained with soya-bean meal fed as a supplement to a dried-grass diet for sheep. The incubation measurements showed that 89% of the soya-bean protein disappeared within 24 h and indicated that it was all ultimately degradable with this diet. When the dried grass was given at a restricted level of feeding the allowance for time of retention in the rumen reduced the estimate of final degradability to 71% (69% within 24 h). With ad libitum feeding there was a faster rate of passage and the final degradability was estimated to be 66% (65% within 24 h).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen
Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., & Stern, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73133-7 · Cited by 1,311
Journal of Agricultural Science
HUHTANEN, P., & HRISTOV, A. N. (2010) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859609990268 · Cited by 746
The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system
Tamminga, S., Van Straalen, W. M., Subnel, A. P. J., Meijer, R. G. M., Steg, A., Wever, C. J. G., & Blok, M. C. (1994) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/0301-6226(94)90043-4 · Cited by 601
France, J., Dijkstra, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Lopez, S., & Bannink, A. (2000) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114500000180 · Cited by 445
Getachew, G., Robinson, P. H., DePeters, E. J., & Taylor, S. J. (2004) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00217-7 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Ørskov, E. R., & McDonald, I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1979-04
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 499-503
- ISSN
- 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5146
- OpenAlex
- W2164366449
- Cited by
- 4,735
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021859600063048
- The paper
- Ørskov, E. R., & McDonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600063048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.