The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables. Part 1. Vitamins C and B and phenolic compounds
Abstract
The first of a two‐part review of the recent and classical literature reveals that loss of nutrients in fresh products during storage and cooking may be more substantial than commonly perceived. Depending on the commodity, freezing and canning processes may preserve nutrient value. The initial thermal treatment of processed products can cause loss of water‐soluble and oxygen‐labile nutrients such as vitamin C and the B vitamins. However, these nutrients are relatively stable during subsequent canned storage owing to the lack of oxygen. Frozen products lose fewer nutrients initially because of the short heating time in blanching, but they lose more nutrients during storage owing to oxidation. Phenolic compounds are also water‐soluble and oxygen‐labile, but changes during processing, storage and cooking appear to be highly variable by commodity. Further studies would facilitate the understanding of the changes in these phytochemicals. Changes in moisture content during storage, cooking and processing can misrepresent changes in nutrient content. These findings indicate that exclusive recommendations of fresh produce ignore the nutrient benefits of canned and frozen products. Nutritional comparison would be facilitated if future research would express nutrient data on a dry weight basis to account for changes in moisture. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rickman, J. C., Bruhn, C. M., & Barrett, D. M. (2007) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2824 · Cited by 252
Self-citation
Cited by
Flavor quality of fruits and vegetables
Kader, A. A. (2008) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.3293 · Cited by 648
Wallace, T. C., Bailey, R. L., Blumberg, J. B., Burton-Freeman, B., Chen, C.-Y. O., Crowe-White, K. M., Drewnowski, A., Hooshmand, S., Johnson, E., Lewis, R., et al. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2019.1632258 · Cited by 638
Ribas-Agustí, A., Martín-Belloso, O., Soliva-Fortuny, R., & Elez-Martínez, P. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1331200 · Cited by 373
Food system strategies for preventing micronutrient malnutrition
Miller, B. D. D., & Welch, R. M. (2013) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.06.008 · Cited by 366
Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research
Enthoven, L., & Van den Broeck, G. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103226 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Rickman, J. C., Barrett, D. M., & Bruhn, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-14
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 930-944
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2150974144
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables. Part 1. Vitamins C and B and phenolic compounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jsfa.2825
- The paper
- Rickman, J. C., Barrett, D. M., & Bruhn, C. M. (2007). Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables. Part 1. Vitamins C and B and phenolic compounds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2825
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.