CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77Genetic and Environmental Crop StudiesFood Nutrient Composition and Product DevelopmentAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Agronomical factors influencing the legumin/vicilin ratio in pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds

Mertens, Cécile, Dehon, Lydie, Bourgeois, Audrey, Verhaeghe‐Cartrysse, Christine, Blecker, Christophe·2012·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4738
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many research studies have investigated the impact of agronomical factors on the protein content of pea (Pisum sativum). This study aimed to establish if a correlation exists between protein content and legumin/vicilin (L/V) ratio in pea seeds and to identify agronomical factors that have an impact on this ratio. RESULTS: The L/V ratio was positively correlated with protein content (r = 0.58, P⩽0.01), but no linear regression was applicable (adjusted R2 = 0.31). Both variety and cultivation year had a highly significant effect on the ratio (P < 0.001). The interaction between these two factors was also highly significant (P < 0.001), some varieties being less sensitive to climatic conditions than others. Cultivation location had a highly significant effect (P < 0.01). There was no interaction between variety and location. Seeding density had a highly significant effect on the ratio (P < 0.01), with a saturation effect above 60 seeds m−2. CONCLUSION: Further studies should establish if a linear regression model can be applied to pea varieties independently. Varieties with a stable L/V ratio can prove to be useful in the food industry. Other agronomical factors (soil type and seeding density) should be considered for the production of pea seeds with a specific L/V ratio. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.4738

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ratio between vicilin and legumin components is a key determinant of functional capacity, showing a positive correlation with protein extractability and beneficial functional properties, notably emulsification.

    “The ratio between vicilin and legumin components is a key determinant of functional capacity, showing a positive correlation with protein extractability and beneficial functional properties, notably emulsification [32,34].”

    From Pea Protein Isolates: From Extraction to Functionality. (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

  • The ratio of vicilin to legumin concentrations is positively associated with high extractability and superior emulsion activity index (EAI).

    “The ratio of vicilin to legumin concentrations is positively associated with high extractability and superior emulsion activity index (EAI) [32,34].”

    From Pea Protein Isolates: From Extraction to Functionality. (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/jsfa.1309 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s11746-007-1134-5 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s00217-007-0678-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/07388550290789487 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14263.x · DOI
  7. 10.1079/BJN2000232 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S1357729800033051 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/food.19860300332 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/jsfa.2740420304 · DOI
  11. Page D, 1999, La graine de pois, une source de protéines prometteuses, OCL, 6, 518
  12. 10.1080/87559129109540903 · DOI
  13. Savage GP, 1989, The nutritional value of peas. A literature review, Nutr Abstr Rev A, 59, 65
  14. 10.1016/S0963-9969(98)00057-X · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.035 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/jf00110a024 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.082 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/jsfa.1742 · DOI
  19. Burstin J, 2006, The relationship between protein content and protein composition of pea seeds, Grain Legumes, 44, 16
  20. 10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00026-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1051/agro:2001143 · DOI
  22. 10.1104/pp.104.056713 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/jf00037a014 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0308-8146(93)90179-J · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF00017941 · DOI
  26. 10.4141/cjps80-161 · DOI
  27. 10.4141/cjps74-047 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1972.tb10131.x · DOI
  29. 10.1021/jf00018a002 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/jsfa.2740330707 · DOI
  31. Robertson RN, 1962, The effect of environmental conditions on the development of pea, Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci, 15, 1, 10.1071/BI9620001 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.07.017 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/jf9701345 · DOI
  34. 10.1046/j.1439-037x.1999.00298.x · DOI
  35. 10.1021/jf980571z · DOI
  36. 10.1021/jf0519008 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Kim YH, 1994, 11S and 7S globulin fractions in soybean seed and soycurd characteristics, Kor J Crop Sci, 39, 348
  38. Gatehouse JA, 1980, Vicia faba: Feeding Value, Processing and Viruses, 173
  39. 10.1007/BF01094045 · DOI
  40. 10.1021/jf00124a052 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00547-2 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/pmic.200700903 · DOI
  43. Dagorn‐ScavinerC Etude des propriétés tensio‐actives des globulines du pois. Application aux isolats protéiques utilisés comme agents d'émulsification ou de moussage.Thesis UFR de Sciences Université de Nantes (1986).
  44. 10.1021/jf0340052 · DOI
  45. Bock L, 2004, Numerical Map of the Soils of Wallonie
  46. 10.1016/S0141-8130(01)00173-8 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/jsfa.2740440208 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/BF01091965 · DOI
  49. 10.4141/P06-057 · DOI
  50. BladeSF LopetinskyK OlsonM LaflammePandPhillipsC High protein lupins: diversifying the pulse industry in western Canada.Proc. 4th Int. Crop Science Congr. Brisbane. (2004).
  51. Khaliq A, 1999, Optimization of seeding density and nitrogen application in wheat cv Inqualab‐91 under Faisalabad conditions, Int J Agric Biol, 1, 241

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mertens, C., Dehon, L., Bourgeois, A., Verhaeghe‐Cartrysse, C., & Blecker, C.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Mertens, Cécile
ORCID
Blecker, Christophe
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-09
Volume
92
Issue
8
Pages
1591-1596
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
DOI
10.1002/jsfa.4738
OpenAlex
W2013396817
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Waalse Gewest
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
pea, Pisum sativum, seed protein content, pea varieties, cultivation year, seeding rate, seed storage proteins, legumin, vicilin
MeSH terms
Legumins, Agriculture, Climate, Environment, Humans, Plant Proteins, Seeds, Species Specificity, Pisum sativum, Seed Storage Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review