Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High‐throughput glycosylation analysis of intact monoclonal antibodies by mass spectrometry coupled with capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography

Naumann, Lukas, Schlossbauer, Patrick, Klingler, Florian, Hesse, Friedemann, Otte, Kerstin, Neusüß, Christian·2022·Journal of Separation Science

Abstract

The analysis of monoclonal antibodies glycosylation is a crucial quality control attribute of biopharmaceutical drugs. High throughput screening approaches for antibody glycoform analysis are required in various stages of process optimization. Here, we present high throughput screening suitable mass spectrometry‐based workflows for the analysis of intact antibody glycosylation out of cell supernatants. Capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography were coupled with quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry or Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Both separation methods offer fast separation (10–15 min) and the capability to prevent the separated cell supernatant matrix to enter the mass spectrometry by post‐separation valving. Both mass spectrometry instruments provide comparable results and both are sufficient to determine the glycosylation pattern of the five major glycoforms of the measured antibodies. However, the Orbitrap yields higher sensitivity of 25 μg/mL (CE‐nanoCEasy‐Orbitrap mass spectrometry) and 5 μg/mL (liquid chromatography‐Orbitrap mass spectrometry). Data processing was optimized for a faster processing and easier detection of low abundant glycoforms based on averaged charge‐deconvoluted mass spectra. This approach combines a non‐target glycoform analysis while yielding the same glycosylation pattern as the traditional approach based on extracted ion traces. The presented methods enable the high throughput screening of the glycosylation pattern of antibodies down to low μg/mL‐range out of cell supernatant without any sample preparation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jssc.202100865

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIGURE 1 High-throughput screening (HTS) workflow overview, containing all steps of sampling, analysis, and evaluation
FIGURE 1 High-throughput screening (HTS) workflow overview, containing all steps of sampling, analysis, and evaluationCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIGURE 2 MS comparison based on LC-MS generated data of the 100 μg/mL mAb 1 standard in cell supernatant. Results of measurements with Orbitrap (A-C) and quadruple TOF (QTOF) (D-E) are shown. The average spectra of the detected intact mAb 1 peak is shown in the first row (A, D) with a zoom to the most intensive charge state. Charge-deconvoluted spectra are shown in the second row (B, C, and E). The neutral spectrum of the QTOF measurement shows noise at the peaks (E, zoom). (C) shows a zoom into the neutral spectrum of the LC-Orbitrap MS measurement with the fine structure. *G0F/G2F can be also G1F/G1F
FIGURE 2 MS comparison based on LC-MS generated data of the 100 μg/mL mAb 1 standard in cell supernatant. Results of measurements with Orbitrap (A-C) and quadruple TOF (QTOF) (D-E) are shown. The average spectra of the detected intact mAb 1 peak is shown in the first row (A, D) with a zoom to the most intensive charge state. Charge-deconvoluted spectra are shown in the second row (B, C, and E). The neutral spectrum of the QTOF measurement shows noise at the peaks (E, zoom). (C) shows a zoom into the neutral spectrum of the LC-Orbitrap MS measurement with the fine structure. *G0F/G2F can be also G1F/G1FCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIGURE 3 Comparison of CE-MS (A-C) and LC-MS (D-F). The electropherogram (A) and chromatogram (D) based on the total ion current are shown in the first column (100 μg/mL cell supernatant standard, mAb1, Orbitrap). The charge-deconvoluted spectra of CE (B, C) and LC (E, F) with the annotated glycosylation pattern are shown (300 μg/mL cell supernatant standard, mAb 1): (B) nanoCEasy interface (OT), (C) Triple-tube sprayer (TTS) with optimized parameters (QTOF), (E) LC-MS (OT), (F) LC-MS (QTOF)
FIGURE 3 Comparison of CE-MS (A-C) and LC-MS (D-F). The electropherogram (A) and chromatogram (D) based on the total ion current are shown in the first column (100 μg/mL cell supernatant standard, mAb1, Orbitrap). The charge-deconvoluted spectra of CE (B, C) and LC (E, F) with the annotated glycosylation pattern are shown (300 μg/mL cell supernatant standard, mAb 1): (B) nanoCEasy interface (OT), (C) Triple-tube sprayer (TTS) with optimized parameters (QTOF), (E) LC-MS (OT), (F) LC-MS (QTOF)CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIGURE 4 Comparison of ion trace (A) and spectral (B) approach. The shown data were generated with LC-MS (Orbitrap). The first column shows the processed MS data. An example of summarized extracted ion traces of the five major forms of the mAb 1 glycosylation pattern is shown in (A), followed by an example for the charge-deconvolution (neutral mass, B). Diagram (C) shows the comparison of the calculated relative shares of ion trace and spectral approach (five major glycoforms, mAb 1, 100 μg/mL cell supernatant standard)
FIGURE 4 Comparison of ion trace (A) and spectral (B) approach. The shown data were generated with LC-MS (Orbitrap). The first column shows the processed MS data. An example of summarized extracted ion traces of the five major forms of the mAb 1 glycosylation pattern is shown in (A), followed by an example for the charge-deconvolution (neutral mass, B). Diagram (C) shows the comparison of the calculated relative shares of ion trace and spectral approach (five major glycoforms, mAb 1, 100 μg/mL cell supernatant standard)CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIGURE 5 Concentration dependency of spectral information. The shown maximum intensity for zoom level (A) is 4.0E7 cts and for (B) 5.0E6 cts. Concentrations of mAb 1 standard are: 2500 μg/mL (undiluted) and 100 μg/mL (cell supernatant dilution)
FIGURE 5 Concentration dependency of spectral information. The shown maximum intensity for zoom level (A) is 4.0E7 cts and for (B) 5.0E6 cts. Concentrations of mAb 1 standard are: 2500 μg/mL (undiluted) and 100 μg/mL (cell supernatant dilution)CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIGURE 6 Glycoforms of mAb 3 out a fed-batch fermentation: (A) day 2, (B) day 5, (C) day 8, (D) relative shares of glycoforms including their standard deviation (normalized to G0F/G1F, triplicates). The shares of the glycosylation pattern (major forms shown) is changing between the days. Measured with LC-Orbitrap MS
FIGURE 6 Glycoforms of mAb 3 out a fed-batch fermentation: (A) day 2, (B) day 5, (C) day 8, (D) relative shares of glycoforms including their standard deviation (normalized to G0F/G1F, triplicates). The shares of the glycosylation pattern (major forms shown) is changing between the days. Measured with LC-Orbitrap MSCC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Naumann, L., Schlossbauer, P., Klingler, F., Hesse, F., Otte, K., & Neusüß, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry Aalen University Aalen Germany
  • Department of applied Biotechnology Biberach University of Applied Sciences Biberach Germany
Venue
Journal of Separation Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-27
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
2034-2044
ISSN
  • 1615-9306
  • 1615-9314
Cited by
18
References
37
Language
en
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ 13FH635IB6)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐throughput glycosylation analysis of intact monoclonal antibodies by mass spectrometry coupled with capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jssc.202100865
The paper
Naumann, L., Schlossbauer, P., Klingler, F., Hesse, F., Otte, K., & Neusüß, C. (2022). High‐throughput glycosylation analysis of intact monoclonal antibodies by mass spectrometry coupled with capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography. Journal of Separation Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202100865

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.