The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High‐throughput glycosylation analysis of intact monoclonal antibodies by mass spectrometry coupled with capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography
Abstract
The analysis of monoclonal antibodies glycosylation is a crucial quality control attribute of biopharmaceutical drugs. High throughput screening approaches for antibody glycoform analysis are required in various stages of process optimization. Here, we present high throughput screening suitable mass spectrometry‐based workflows for the analysis of intact antibody glycosylation out of cell supernatants. Capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography were coupled with quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry or Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Both separation methods offer fast separation (10–15 min) and the capability to prevent the separated cell supernatant matrix to enter the mass spectrometry by post‐separation valving. Both mass spectrometry instruments provide comparable results and both are sufficient to determine the glycosylation pattern of the five major glycoforms of the measured antibodies. However, the Orbitrap yields higher sensitivity of 25 μg/mL (CE‐nanoCEasy‐Orbitrap mass spectrometry) and 5 μg/mL (liquid chromatography‐Orbitrap mass spectrometry). Data processing was optimized for a faster processing and easier detection of low abundant glycoforms based on averaged charge‐deconvoluted mass spectra. This approach combines a non‐target glycoform analysis while yielding the same glycosylation pattern as the traditional approach based on extracted ion traces. The presented methods enable the high throughput screening of the glycosylation pattern of antibodies down to low μg/mL‐range out of cell supernatant without any sample preparation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures












Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It can detect a wide range of quality attributes, such as glycosylation patterns [86], charge variants, aggregates and process‐related impurities like host cell proteins (HCP) [87].”
From Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals (2025) · cites this paper as [86]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taylor, P. J. (2005) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.11.007 · Cited by 1,248
Zubarev, R. A., & Makarov, A. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac4001223 · Cited by 658
Characterization of Therapeutic Antibodies and Related Products
Beck, A., Wagner-Rousset, E., Ayoub, D., Van Dorsselaer, A., & Sanglier-Cianférani, S. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac3032355 · Cited by 587
Fc glycans of therapeutic antibodies as critical quality attributes
Reusch, D., & Tejada, M. L. (2015) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwv065 · Cited by 404
Expression systems for therapeutic glycoprotein production
Durocher, Y., & Butler, M. (2009) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2009.10.008 · Cited by 386
Huhn, C., Selman, M. H. J., Ruhaak, L. R., Deelder, A. M., & Wuhrer, M. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800715 · Cited by 301
Stolz, A., Jooß, K., Höcker, O., Römer, J., Schlecht, J., & Neusüß, C. (2019) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.201800331 · Cited by 214
Self-citationGustavsson, S. Å., Samskog, J., Markides, K. E., & Långström, B. (2001) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01328-0 · Cited by 196
Srebalus Barnes, C. A., & Lim, A. (2007) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20129 · Cited by 175
Pacis, E., Yu, M., Autsen, J., Bayer, R., & Li, F. (2011) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.23200 · Cited by 173
Cited by
Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals
Sathiyapriyan, P., Mukherjee, S., Vogel, T., Essen, L., Boerema, D., Vey, M., & Kalina, U. (2025) · Analytical Science Advances · doi:10.1002/ansa.70013 · Cited by 45
Graf, T., Naumann, L., Bonnington, L., Heckel, J., Spensberger, B., Klein, S., Brey, C., Nachtigall, R., Mroz, M., Hogg, T. V., et al. (2024) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465013 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Naumann, L., Schlossbauer, P., Klingler, F., Hesse, F., Otte, K., & Neusüß, C.
- Affiliations
- Department of Chemistry Aalen University Aalen Germany
- Department of applied Biotechnology Biberach University of Applied Sciences Biberach Germany
- ORCID
- Naumann, Lukas
- Venue
- Journal of Separation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-01-27
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2034-2044
- ISSN
- 1615-9306
- 1615-9314
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 37
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ 13FH635IB6)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐throughput glycosylation analysis of intact monoclonal antibodies by mass spectrometry coupled with capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jssc.202100865
- The paper
- Naumann, L., Schlossbauer, P., Klingler, F., Hesse, F., Otte, K., & Neusüß, C. (2022). High‐throughput glycosylation analysis of intact monoclonal antibodies by mass spectrometry coupled with capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography. Journal of Separation Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202100865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.