Cited by 150Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and Trauma

Trajectories of PTSD symptoms following sexual assault: Is resilience the modal outcome?

Steenkamp, Maria M., Dickstein, Benjamin D., Salters‐Pedneault, Kristalyn, Hofmann, Stefan G., Litz, Brett T.·2012·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Theoretical frameworks positing qualitatively distinct trajectories of posttrauma outcome have received initial empirical support, but have not been investigated in cases of severe interpersonal trauma. To address this limitation, we conducted latent class growth analysis with longitudinal data collected from 119 female sexual assault survivors at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-months postassault. Participants' mean age was 33 years; 63% were White. We hypothesized that given the severity of exposure associated with sexual assault, resilience would not be the modal course of adaptation. Four distinct PTSD growth trajectories, representing unique latent classes of participants, best fit the data: a high chronic trajectory, a moderate chronic trajectory, a moderate recovery trajectory, and a marked recovery trajectory. Contrary to previous studies and recent theoretical models, resilience and resistance trajectories were not observed, as high levels of distress were evident in nearly all participants at 1-month postassault. These results suggest that theoretical models of posttrauma response positing resilience as the modal outcome may not generalize to cases of sexual assault.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21718

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Immediately following sexual assault, the majority of survivors experience PTSD symptoms.

    “Immediately following sexual assault, the majority of survivors experience PTSD symptoms (Rothbaum et al., 1992; Steenkamp et al., 2012).”

    From PTSD in the Year Following Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Steenkamp et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steenkamp, M. M., Dickstein, B. D., Salters‐Pedneault, K., Hofmann, S. G., & Litz, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Eastern Connecticut State University (US)
Corresponding author
Steenkamp, Maria M.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-13
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
469-474
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2068827642
Cited by
150
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, sexual assault, PTSD symptom trajectories, resilience, interpersonal trauma, latent class growth analysis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Offenses, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Crime Victims, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review