Cited by 11Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSleep and related disordersPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Self‐Monitoring of Reexperiencing Symptoms: A Randomized Trial

Brown, Amanda Joelle, Bollini, Annie M., Craighead, Linda W., Astin, Millie C., Norrholm, Seth Davin, Bradley, Bekh·2014·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

The efficacy of a brief intervention to self‐monitor reexperiencing symptoms was evaluated in 137 U.S. combat veterans with PTSD who were enrolled in 5‐week psychoeducation groups at a large Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Groups were randomized to psychoeducation alone (Education Control, n = 50) or psychoeducation plus intrusion monitoring (Education + Monitoring, n = 87). Education + Monitoring participants were asked to make a daily record of the number and content of nightmares, flashbacks, intrusive trauma‐related thoughts, and physiological and emotional reactions to triggers. Avoidance symptoms were reduced in both conditions (η 2 = .093), with no additional benefit from intrusion monitoring (η 2 = .001). Compliance with intrusion monitoring was markedly low, which complicated the interpretation of the study findings. Even though intrusion monitoring has a strong theoretical foundation and may be an efficient and cost‐effective alternative to more structured treatments for PTSD, the effect of intrusion monitoring will not be clearly understood until higher compliance can be achieved. Future work in this area should address barriers to compliance and investigate strategies for enhancing motivation to engage in self‐monitoring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21950

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, A. J., Bollini, A. M., Craighead, L. W., Astin, M. C., Norrholm, S. D., & Bradley, B.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Washington DC VA Medical Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Amanda Joelle
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
519-525
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W1917985395
Cited by
11
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, combat veterans, intrusion monitoring, self-monitoring, re-experiencing symptoms, psychoeducation, nightmares, flashbacks, avoidance symptoms, medication adherence, brief intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Brief, Self Care, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review